From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9312018E for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751764AbcHHWgq (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:36:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50076 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbcHHWgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:36:45 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6144134145; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:36:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=n3b95+EaA23f5DwiWBWfy2Hrn18=; b=eLa23J YtXDlLl6hnQpKsEQ9vnM0TH3m8uyOOPm2vQFXW3BPCVnV7spsO1tTaI9FwMn231/ xRozRTFnVFESNwlG71NdmlbOUEp6MeziW3xvRSKiwXOXmMglFKvagHXB2S4B0yv7 GIt7G+NnJ0frKeaaCUbFRJPoAMfT1MDtecqqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BjdvQZVfTiJtnMBGTSI4wjJ16T40Xeqd 63oAB5OXvyWItSofPHd/7nAJQHHm4/yS9ki/4pyoLMZExs0rwhaPaKhmhjf6NYEU T3Ae9r4ucqmQV6guG9XiX590x+k7SIcTKPH7/K5vgfcHpU7PbFMqew+rmhuy2jEd f8RxL7bWkAw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584A634144; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF67F34141; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:36:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael Haggerty Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Stefan Beller , Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine , Jeff King , Johannes Sixt , Duy Nguyen , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Na?= =?utf-8?Q?r=C4=99bski?= , Richard Ipsum , Eric Wong , Josh Triplett , Lars Schneider , Philip Oakley Subject: Re: patch submission process, was Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors References: <8ff71aba37be979f05abf88f467ec932aa522bdd.1470051326.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <6c937f79-2b82-619d-51fe-adccbe09bd66@alum.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:36:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6c937f79-2b82-619d-51fe-adccbe09bd66@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:20:22 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9529BF2E-5DB8-11E6-A57C-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael Haggerty writes: > Is it *really* so insane to consider moving collaboration on the Git > project to GitHub or some other similar platform? I only know how "pull requests" and "issues" discussion in GitHub Web interface _currently_ looks like, so if you have even more wonderful thing in the works, I _might_ be swayed otherwise, but I do not think it is sane to expect that the same quality and quantity of reviews as we do here can be maintained with that thing.