From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D792771E for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 05:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785131147; cv=none; b=NjC1H5dJZrh5c3g5iQaojK1g+fp6r1chljbjepHRq8ybIbVRPkV4MkqkBj9MrimjivV/1ANCZkM+1tRoI4dhPAxzZnMSo/1fGraCrOkkjA4AtsGRDYpRcdUeSpZeOjDzcwKE1q0GqlNj4sAXylYLtIkKbWPuRXQl22KwdY5igBo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785131147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VIl5tmmErlJIYe/mqBGbWiSnVJlzvMDh/nyiOMOkVlw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f3obVolpUTbipB6zvasID6sEIdWNheBWHbmhz+05Kx6+nOoyDWLKKhnpheiqwBUsJheLFwnaUz68GnNkbfrO7Iew4auPV292a+eZIW6PDr7LLumTHAEq8nPbuYA1KSdDt5yKOpcjvYAhSdOUXHXHAeERQ9ZJC5TxwgVg9SRdmoY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=lBe4AcPL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=KtCQ/kiE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="lBe4AcPL"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="KtCQ/kiE" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63ADC7A030A; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:45:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:45:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1785131144; x=1785217544; bh=39GebDNQ9V D6WzLmW2UIcJiHYMH22VTSJD8dHdRbFho=; b=lBe4AcPLEPEKKNEnihCLbpLDJj UBtTXfqIUpAZkxkrGRrzrDws2MglcBlUsir+nahwq+30soRBaRfbJ3PPob/P3Xll PGpIw8nSWe7/P26IJ2iqRBRzjEw6AXrCe+5Nd3IOs8TninM+mvuN6w0EsNFnkg1C 0dJbZ6UwVipKLb773ed9DLApTicbiNO6RlzvAW30g13mkPzdn2n9DqVxx+QHA8L3 pKxGcp4PguI/rpEPvK/whv6jwKqB3hhEss0Sx/H8K7B+luk+IweVced0kq/bwxxo UTaXRlUWGsi3e8f68ommjBlWK4w+s2fHIQGD2NLvBt0854VznUGEfL+6fFWw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1785131144; x=1785217544; bh=39GebDNQ9VD6WzLmW2UIcJiHYMH22VTSJD8 dHdRbFho=; b=KtCQ/kiEqZWcN/74yYje1DVDEUZ8W6iNW07ff7Q8IRVirxnj4wG 5ve+HuCWIR54Qs11rRjaMumza2FyUxJCevPGgm0BjwDNrV73zPURRt9GRrK9prEU Dx8k956W000t2TYfZTKkvNUK1G565Ny0NcMAcFAXQiQixJ7fWTUqg1KS9DAvBDMk t9oHNm7SuXA/aPJcnQ4XKwTb5FzmMdzT5z+aT69Hw14cXWYfyhlva1m7gZOfjVy6 TOY4RsrY1R6WKaY5hF/Za7gv+9JRaQeM54hv+U8KmeK0EGeWldD8TgIuBDJuQn/P gtiQUd3W5c21f5HAe5ouDxkqiSHKC0xvnFA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTE7JAbQrYxDHG6/23RuPZo/keSNS7t51qVO+DKdRwInKs/ztLaQJEIcdklDqf36Yu 8LWwQpnNZFi9S6xo2rQRS/n4+XS9XpbjRqOltJjGFQAJVgwfN8Xc0rdaXaG4k5up3Sgh7d ERlvSv6yuGwzMektjmHNah4RJhi0Su6KALiPsrYG9On/DNV2dYiyw+WZe4OVqjFa/5M42x P5GF38xNwPIZTM6OrAupbLnvODwvMFfELDH4wmyDa+VJzqHQVuTr5nsReRDT20UvAo9Tly t0j7/6bOknMz4wlnJlrmCZCJ9H0pVVHzWxonQxLIJ+k4oPvD8/3bojVtGVD0pKhe/QQlj7 ZmLgfGYDfnUhiMeGXRjyJLBl+pIv74qVK9mJp8hp0kLfGdxB4D6dl4Zd4X7lMfHY+6vubD OpXYJISZozjSnMlQBzWr2ILfAKCzJtlo6+95fowI2vkpbgeGxfWrFVOCh7B15pFhF87dTD lXvcyld2B0nFhSf+F5mOJTXdgcQ/QhyyyliTDcE8CywU5YJ/mtW5fBaAz1civI09mfWm4J Sy4glAaX0yhrapEDQEFFj7vrrInh8oeg5ZLf/WU1MjkQMZHhd3HH2tMMUFuLIJyox3dZmo pOzKv+EAAFVLbZDcHFa9tOetXa8vJgzjh5lXfqIl1YX8TF5KsKE+Q3J7bswA X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:45:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: erik88 Cc: "brian m. carlson" , Patrick Steinhardt , Emin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=96zata?= via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Greg Hewgill , Micheil Smith , Michael Haggerty , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Emin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=96zata?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] stash: add 'rename' subcommand In-Reply-To: (erik's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:00:42 +0200") References: Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 22:45:41 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain erik88 writes: > On 26/07/16 06:11PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "brian m. carlson" writes: >> >> > I have a large number of stashes in my git.git repository (211 at >> > present) and it may be that I, in a mad rush to solve some problem or >> > another, went with the default message. I do this kind of thing with >> > repositories at work all the time. But it's inconvenient to have to >> > search through `git stash list -p` to see which change it was and which >> > stash I need to pop to resume my work, so I can see the utility of this >> > approach. > > Same. I always accumulate 100+ stashes. I never bother with a message > when I stash. 90-95% of the stashes are useless cruft but there's always > an experiment, a script file of some sort, which turns out to be useful. OK, so editing the log message for each stash entry is already a use case. In that case, I no longer object to the feature in principle. At least, I cannot think of a way for it to encourage any bad workflows. The next step is for someone to review the implementation. I have not read the implementation at all, and it will be quite a while until I get to it (if I ever do). >> Hmph, are you saying that you are going to wade through 211 >> stash entries one by one and reword them? > > Not me but my AI agent ;-) I have no sympathy for you, then. Your AI agent should be able to unstash and restash 211 entries one by one and reword them just fine ;-).