From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] config: let git_config_parse_key() validate quietly
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 23:08:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtsrlujah.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d938ebf95a817c00a415670c08b839747d711d29.1780407557.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:39:16 +0000")
"Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
>
> Add a "quiet" parameter that suppresses the error() calls, and let
> store_key be NULL to skip the canonical-copy allocation. Existing
> callers pass 0 for quiet.
Hmph.
The way this patch did this may have been easier to implement, but
is a bit different from what I had in mind when I suggested to
"refactor" the existing logic.
Perhaps the updated "git_config_parse_key()" in this patch should be
renamed to be a file-scape static internal helper, and the existing
"git_config_parse_key()" should become a thin wrapper around that
new helper function, retaining the current external interface,
requiring no changes to existing callers.
Then in the next step, config.[ch] can add a new entry point that
serves the purpose of is_valid_key() in the previous iteration,
perhaps call it is_valid_git_config_key() or something like that
(Patrick or others may want to suggest a better word order in its
name). That way, we do not have to sprinkle many calls into
this (rather ugly) version of git_config_parse_key() with overly
wide interface that repeats meaningless NULL/0/1 parameters that no
callers want to use (other than for the purpose of differenciating
the real git_config_parse_key() calls from the new calls made to the
same function to ask "is this a valid key or not, yes/no?".
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 13:58 [PATCH] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-14 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-14 22:16 ` [PATCH] fetch: add fetch.pruneLocalBranches config Harald Nordgren
2026-05-15 1:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-15 7:56 ` Email issues Harald Nordgren
2026-05-15 12:02 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-05-15 9:39 ` [PATCH] fetch: add fetch.pruneLocalBranches config Harald Nordgren
2026-05-16 12:51 ` [PATCH] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren
2026-05-16 12:52 ` [PATCH v2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" in set context Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-25 8:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-25 9:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-26 19:21 ` [PATCH v4] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-05-26 19:24 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-06-01 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-01 23:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] config: let git_config_parse_key() validate quietly Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 14:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-06-02 16:31 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-06-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 14:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] config: suggest the correct form when key contains "=" Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] config: add git_config_key_is_valid() for quiet validation Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-06-02 18:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] config: improve diagnostic for "set" with missing value Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtsrlujah.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox