From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995023BE155 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774995088; cv=none; b=edfOubBvOLxmqqHDD34NDlZu+nl9CSBVZImGrO5RuXAghV6GCevz/vpRvr20ho6f4U1bSPkR4jAcxUtrQXE1OCWjJ3GWgyqckK8aY5bvyMpaGF31dG13wtFXaHKT/1w9tWkGf9boSNM6CZmhw54bpXsnMns4o+daqASnpXxk8MI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774995088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ynpzxLT7i7iWe2Py50pTDpW9FTFQJxnb6fD+ywDkYuo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bB3K/UOazVkViME9uWPtC+Ofcw/wIul3CLHE15Bd/NtwDAiIgZyMKKb1nk1zu5ZkbD+5kloV+6YtEVJ/CMKQlz82vsSRDYYy1bNxMCiQEa+zMjHposPDfmBNEL5hhD/CwMeJLk0vi4uTrOgaY5mNmSh2aSwLL2G5CP7hCeNIoM0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=aejdY7LT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=fU8nO11g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="aejdY7LT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="fU8nO11g" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC37A00E7; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:11:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1774995086; x=1775081486; bh=r/OMFpZMwY kmS97X4x/v3ueS2r2Y7I+n5wHV2Hx0+eA=; b=aejdY7LTQHK8m0QEnM3Cb48OtB 0LydtVgikUWsxuFg3DpSiJukBOU5z/IQxUBrYeUeeSa2ui1iw+mvvZITT8mO2pwB 8PjF++UWs3LkoTA0kuVX4MZiLXwS054RvAJJt1SGIqJw2s0Giwna7LErx+/HYez+ xskN7AJbFqvwJQyavEJ0m8HT1MdpuJAuqVmI0m3mEtnSTnFu961QsTUkPMpybxjI ccY4Vdb/MYP7dAqBDOzBJvP9ASOVhpHbKjOlXDTG4AD518RSNBjMPuTps/IFvw9l rFpcuRycOofxAU3kJMSruhExTqmNmcJeIiG1rV6iHblSx/K6UEnvBhZfM3Eg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1774995086; x=1775081486; bh=r/OMFpZMwYkmS97X4x/v3ueS2r2Y7I+n5wH V2Hx0+eA=; b=fU8nO11gPS9veu5Os9Xb/vQ2P3qgWzoz0F6rk2MEzo8RI+9VpQq iNsQrWI4i/GMY7dy++OM3GAQpGSkoTYLP9RaS07gBjPnfleMADgE7dgQEEL/e6bL TQaQl0TIyNVTEs12P+jHmWDmhx/0JWzB3xELCVr8Iv90jM5CXvm6vfWBvpGuMzIE 71Q9641BjQcsKAawFET3T39WmbJxuCVMyTdAIdAme7/m/SBZgs4FMd/Km/qcxVVm 00IfmBjQ+u+IvisEH0CeShlIspUChJrH41IALAklfNx8DthGGqFahBH6PsckUKbr yH9tB5174WmreOXGdcHjJ9EJhkAP+zttpdw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgddufeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurh ephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtofdttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecu jfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepgfetjeegudevueetieduhffhgedutdejhfejvdffleetlefhtdevjeeuheduffeu necuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhn sggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehjlhhtoh gslhgvrhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhn vghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptghhrhhishhtihgrnhdrtghouhguvghrsehgmhgrih hlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:11:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Justin Tobler Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fast-import: extend signed object handling modes In-Reply-To: <20260326191414.3783974-1-jltobler@gmail.com> (Justin Tobler's message of "Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:14:09 -0500") References: <20260326191414.3783974-1-jltobler@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:11:25 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Justin Tobler writes: > Changes since V1: > - Added a prepatory patch which unifies how unsupported signing modes > are handled for git-fast-export(1). Now they are treated like any > other unknown signing mode. Unsupported signing modes for > '--signed-tags' in git-fast-import(1) are left alone because this > series progressively adds support for all these currently unsupported > modes. Even though you have this inter-iteration change log (which is very good), as the cover letter is not sent as a reply to the cover letter of the previous iteration, the mailing list archive https://lore.kernel.org/git/20260326191414.3783974-1-jltobler@gmail.com/ does not help us navigate to the previous iteration https://lore.kernel.org/git/20260324215513.764739-1-jltobler@gmail.com/ very easily (I found the above URL by cheating---I looked at notes/amlog for a commit from previous iteration jt/fast-import-signed-modes@{1}---but that is not for everybody). Looks like I was the only one who was interested enough to comment on the patches over these two iterations, which is a bit sad, but I think the patches are fairly cleanly done and are ready for 'next'. Let me mark the topic as such in the "What's cooking" report. Thanks.