public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote: use plural-only message for diverged branch status
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:38:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtsuiuugy.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqqzpmwdyi.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2026 09:52:37 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
>>
>> Drop Q_() singular form and use _() with the plural string only.
>
> I know the commit title talks about plural-only, but please make
> sure that the body of the log message carries all the necessary
> information to justify the change standalone.  "In the else clause,
> both ours and theirs are positive integers so ours+theirs must be at
> least 2, hence there is no need to prepare singular and plural
> variants of the message", or something to that effect, perhaps.
>
> The patch text and the reasoning behind it does sound familiar and I
> vaguely recall discussing about it ;-)
>
> Thanks.

I queued the patch, tentatively with this rewritten message:

    remote: don't use Q_() when it is not needed

    In this code path, both ours and theirs are already known to be
    positive integers, so ours + theirs will always be plural, never
    using the first variant given to Q_().

    Just use _() with the plural string only.

    Signed-off-by: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-14 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-14  9:12 [PATCH] remote: use plural-only message for diverged branch status Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-03-14  9:16 ` [PATCH] checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching Harald Nordgren
2026-03-14 16:52 ` [PATCH] remote: use plural-only message for diverged branch status Junio C Hamano
2026-03-14 18:38   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-03-14 20:08     ` Phillip Wood
2026-03-15  2:08       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-16 10:49         ` Phillip Wood
2026-03-16 17:06           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-25  4:29             ` Kaartic Sivaraam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqtsuiuugy.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox