From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D661366577 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 17:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772560692; cv=none; b=LM6RUgc/QnJYsv86lR/zyb9Rc82W0i5xnkRI3doJAdyyDwmqItHiEXDpJOHX8MMalypK28AVG+wcmbF6Gkvd/ziRbI1to4+hgE7dUPh1HThf7V6tt4atL3GzDeuIHRjGNbDpYEvvV0F6X7ZLBfujbto3i+/XaPgW2AaUGxVAUTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772560692; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ji2YkUN8SbNKlpwoyLXPKQSKwneS24bTkuot7O954yw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qv7X35KXlKl566cYJ0dPvj6AQ+JFdP5zudaS2rRLARyG8a/zgaCp8Yh2TcMTfJxARFtCxwe/h0blifwebBWR8YTwAEcPFWGS+vG+1tG27IL3tskjie0w5SLxIxqzMK9zHCqs0FqZzsqsOoeTn3bvBB68ZEDalq18i3tM2kjUlm8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=OYw8eXqg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=lObx1Ro/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="OYw8eXqg"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="lObx1Ro/" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB574EC027D; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 12:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:58:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1772560690; x=1772647090; bh=qv975Q5Cx6 MoSdbMzaaQBcYrRC7yTsoF5zYI0WhSv90=; b=OYw8eXqgrD7XdZ6ZSmqmmvBlXp 651QUUhl4gUX/Chz/hQb2CtijQBQM9jW3QxRSgqyUYZ+owT2bWZTGfASU3+vabxs 3FCgV8OY+RfrOogi+uWwrvF1NC/nqn+dvFL1U42kNO/xzb/CAwOTP9UVzAC74AUA VS6ragDLAEsEyotrQzSqi8+fDLQegiX3gKuxP7R1Isk934BRBZKy3tMF+rTSF0cB luDoPtH0UQbQapbJd57+GJGevQ7gaXAiE272Km/CM5L/ZBAUdan4hwRPzGEOkBeE HpzQ/vHgaTGe8AoDP0zEJ54wRF8oUXvg07l7NvWy2gxubGANlEvgnTWsP2Ew== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1772560690; x=1772647090; bh=qv975Q5Cx6MoSdbMzaaQBcYrRC7yTsoF5zY I0WhSv90=; b=lObx1Ro/Rq0mJxbgQcWU86BJNPFnVeqYAlH0FgI1aaNXRP3tWwh Merec5HjvLNAF3bezcwM4yuJfpBeAOzhwMXvRex6tI8UzKH0gwFASd0qvGS1ItMD Ki/V5evzZecrIPE+ASUg+FCdp3dLqnCEo0OVAvN33yqMoNlKUnrm/jVdFhIQQKoV 26ZrNx6yM7cvcIKaY+a28Kp9Xxl4Nyo4IMtb+6VP9uvOeYPLgOgF6TIh/g3AXv80 iAIpUOBz8n8/8tz4qXZslEX79JVZ7pLjaYd0KqqQKgTgWXZlmwhtdYk9wXsSqAqY uIRiX+ohDVUN0bF7+RBnDagzi2qMEqcPj3w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvieduvdegucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtofdttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepieekueefhfetvdfftdegfeekhfffgefgfeeivddugeffgfffffevvedvieel ffdunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepjedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhgrnh essghrrghithhhfigrihhtvgdruggvvhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgv thesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrd horhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptghhrhhishhtihgrnhdrtghouhguvghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgt ohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgvsehtthgrhihlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 12:58:10 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Alan Braithwaite , Alan Braithwaite , git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch, clone: add fetch.blobSizeLimit config In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:08:56 +0100") References: Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 09:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > I think using something like "clone..defaultObjectFilter" would be > a more sensible design. The idea is that we'd only honor this filter on > the initial clone to basically be equivalent to `git clone --filter=`. I > don't think any subsequent fetches should be impacted at all, as turning > a full clone into a partial clone would need more consideration. Yup, I like this one. Should be giving a repository fully, or be some pattern that groups similar repositories together? You would not be wanting to clone exactly the same repository so many times for a configuration variable to matter in general.