From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>,
Ran Ari-Gur <ran.arigur+git@samsara.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "raa.lkml@gmail.com" <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] `git clone '-c KEY=VALUE'` no longer works
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:06:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtsygoh96.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126150215.GB4143292@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:02:15 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> That doesn't trigger via "git -c", because we use the "new" form these
> days (so it started rejecting the extra whitespace in 2021). And you'd
> only see it if you hand-crafted the variable, or an old version of Git
> set parameters that were then parsed by a newer one.
>
> So whether that is a case we care about is up for debate. But if we are
> going to accommodate backwards compatibility, we have to decide where to
> draw the line.
I was hoping we already drew the line above the "clone" thing ;-)
> The old code actually trimmed both sides. So:
>
> $ GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS="'foo.bar =baz'" git.v2.51.0 config foo.bar
> baz
>
> $ GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS="'foo.bar =baz'" git.v2.52.0 config foo.bar
> error: invalid key: foo.bar
> fatal: unable to parse command-line config
>
> And I think the latter would still fail with your patch. Again, that
> might not matter to us, if all we care about is making:
>
> git clone '-c foo.bar=baz' ...
>
> work as before. But I'm still skeptical that is worthwhile (especially
> given that nobody noticed the same change to "git -c" a few years ago).
True.
I do not think I can convince myself to care about this deeply
enough.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 5:23 [BUG] `git clone '-c KEY=VALUE'` no longer works Ran Ari-Gur
2025-11-24 16:20 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-11-24 21:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-24 23:55 ` Jeff King
2025-11-25 1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-25 22:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-26 15:02 ` Jeff King
2025-11-26 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-11-30 13:49 ` Jeff King
2025-11-30 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-26 14:53 ` Jeff King
2025-11-26 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-24 22:57 ` Jeff King
2025-11-25 20:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtsygoh96.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=ran.arigur+git@samsara.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).