From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49E6225766 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 16:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748881238; cv=none; b=VZuQLK+LQCFssGeupNclpaYvsGJDimhu4UllRtIxGD1Yl8PhN+PvsryYS9w0Ov3k9phySrbW7AK+acYB2qbI0a1XK0k4mq0yIJagHezIgNxyv4B+cGjQiW8Se4mbVJRwFITlHS+BPf4RhmWUd8Y1YjLgbJ7/Bmu/fKVBNCO8Ezw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748881238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xbJKIcs1xFzTD8ikTZpMFUUi09e3Ph+Rc39fDzKvSSQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C4yERpR9P3IgX5UM/2Q6ZCR/439PB3z9YV57ESsCyYH6o3pRsjrACbzZVvaUCmqx6RI2FKwrt3A7mhJv8GumjVZw2H6u5sZLGAKWuKVY8HCuYihIY/4eN22Z+ty5wdP2p6mhFJjRSWjdXl72NhiJnHcSYrYEMXUaU1HMJGPWuTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Ffy5BSBT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=gmxveVvG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Ffy5BSBT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="gmxveVvG" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57191380382; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:20:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Jun 2025 12:20:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1748881234; x=1748967634; bh=EQ6HGvzOnS zN1kU247BApDCRD03lZJhyB+zeBFCl/Q0=; b=Ffy5BSBTVEBMlxQsP5xg+rAuDQ eoS7R27wuXgsN+8mgXKx6LMXAIaH8m4mFz14nMG8yKHinttcPqXO3tUTDTmebMp2 1xdtfWQd79GRb43Wsvl4sCTnPoSGWpfJNnCLXeplTt4LVDdadywOv+65JjqMazcq JB4zx5RNbD+dE+PQXibY39aupsiG5t49ySRtM467Ux8j1/AuWrfKIoeXGKDkUaRx NLRQjTJ/3OJJTGv2Zf9gALanJOj07+nLUwH41/c+vltj2nSsLzo9PbJ+3GQ1QAPe 9IwGt6TRAaOChigYy8rHNm081SZqlJCoeCAJQacpDLys3rJtl8zYqL71HKmg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1748881234; x=1748967634; bh=EQ6HGvzOnSzN1kU247BApDCRD03lZJhyB+z eBFCl/Q0=; b=gmxveVvGFQjSZeQCUo4Ese+uDptyKtrqStMV2C62jvGCWonxlOp 9Yx6+6GKw+fU44IBMDff5m4+DGdFqyzrplHPiEXDQml/RZ+IgXP320vN0QMkdzPV T7R2mtYAzyC36N2lN8Bx22fadYwdb0UgTj8ThvnuNts2/Nt8dTM2qRG0KR/KMQqw 1MRO/qcJQmzuz3E2646h/ibuzRobWISbIGlG1iCLZpJpN+bcH7xSOsRC7DrvyNqb ro68u/CmtpuJZ47P5sU5mJcqrDiAniDr6+xkwdsn+Gu2EtY95POZKn2yywRKcD6Q lk81bmmdk2yt0AMTGIJLHYaTrmmBVxkiXmA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdefkedugeculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhff kfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoe hgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteej heeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgs ohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeelpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtph htthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopehluhhkvghshhhusegurghtrgifihhrvgdrihhopdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvfihrvg hnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdr ohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvg hffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhrghnnhgvshdrshgthhhinhguvghlihhnsehg mhigrdguvgdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhstghoohhlsehtuhigfhgrmhhilhihrdhorh hgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:20:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: Luke Shumaker , Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH] fast-(import|export): improve on the signature algorithm name In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Mon, 2 Jun 2025 17:56:10 +0200") References: <20250424203904.909777-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 09:20:32 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christian Couder writes: >> -Earlier versions this command that did not have '--signed-commits' >> -behaved as if '--signed-commits=strip'. As an escape hatch for users >> -of tools that call 'git fast-export' but do not yet support >> -'--signed-commits', you may set the environment variable >> -'FAST_EXPORT_SIGNED_COMMITS_NOABORT=1' in order to change the default >> -from 'abort' to 'warn-strip'. >> +NOTE: This is highly experimental and the format of the data stream may >> +change in the future without compatibility guarantees. > > I wonder if it should say that the default is likely to change too? It is to be decided in the future and we have no plan to do so before the feature loses "experimental" label, no? Those who are opting into a highly experimental feature would know that already. >> +test_expect_success GPG 'signed-commits default is same as strip' ' > > Here also maybe we should say that the default could change in case > advanced users look at test cases to get hints at what is cast in > stone? The same answer applies.