From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B2313FF9 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 20:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716410734; cv=none; b=oKwJBhxxkGUU1mxZrKCrWlESeM6ObB74JCb9gb2y56E9URbs3RdLoy5rocu8ZPWrCBPEAAfkZEDpAm5rEJWl0qzkxvzvK9/CXvggdpWhEUm0OX3h9dYeGl7mSjiOSehRW7DI3eu85zKZ0Ce+4rfKmudk1nBINg4rL7klCMR2IF0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716410734; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+g01Rvj7+Uy0A/kq4hHufkWbQUwNmuNJlBa/nTDz5eY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qZkBiAoRecMFR8JOW5pAM5G7lS+4UsrLxpP2SCSFKMwYwo7Vk7tKyXOMgEhhkb/vf7iRbG2iJLH5BxWS45qnizedif0W9HK+VEM+wvP3BM1c06b+KNitzQQj1psFGOKABaYADyeBpmlTslHBRvEJcqF2EiKwM2SFTLAK8CHvlbE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=ebI7cHh0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ebI7cHh0" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B712B0B4; Wed, 22 May 2024 16:45:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+g01Rvj7+Uy0A/kq4hHufkWbQUwNmuNJlBa/nT Dz5eY=; b=ebI7cHh00fFPBvTUUJDej5rTdXieNEcdfmaBXzDRyeuVwxP3UDMzNN RACbjHG6vS+6YTQ7S/9kgYSeoTg/T3u66MozP4s9amyxpoo/aU9pUqxY1jtbPcGh 9jcwQjpyHPBNfcxpxFYdf/qGmLPz9t/SEaWX4jdWtLUEudTSRuhd0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4002B0B3; Wed, 22 May 2024 16:45:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.173.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CB8A2B0B2; Wed, 22 May 2024 16:45:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Dragan Simic Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Rub=C3=A9n?= Justo , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: note that interactive.singleKey is disabled by default In-Reply-To: <54c318f42ce63f0575ea48f3dc1e8361@manjaro.org> (Dragan Simic's message of "Wed, 22 May 2024 20:52:43 +0200") References: <3141fe9f7328a97bf3818748421f6ae929120626.1716363167.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <54c318f42ce63f0575ea48f3dc1e8361@manjaro.org> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 13:45:30 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3AC2CC42-187C-11EF-8CC8-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Dragan Simic writes: > interactive.singleKey > If true, allow the user to provide one-letter input with a > single key (i.e., without hitting Enter key) in interactive > commands. > [...] > > Thoughts? It would be more consistent and a bit more clear, without > putting too much stress on the actual default value. "When set to true" or "when configured to true" is much better than "defaults to true". I am ambivalent about "If true", though. It still leaves it open for some mysterious "default" mechanism giving the value true without user doing anything explicitly.