From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA4212B89 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712367012; cv=none; b=Qnew4BR7H8JkgXyZ3gzIRnENnVZUxhRRDtS7ovUwuQXFMlT2HUt8auEJ1geF8GFtxvqGBm9QV/IIxjhzKU154XAa/RoCMeC73/eae2zwZeehF/DkVVwRRvgJweMXWVYE2kfnB5hXnALx5h4YCDe64ol2hyh4bpKVYIQQvHoFd8w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712367012; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kZHvLfYNvmS2XjWcEzmM7B1IjJBIokxG3iQkhyCjiAs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q9NPYqFL6/UMiTU3BaJLLOf0CPP3vCDuF6MO5lNgKeq7rjAoqeZQvOTMDWP2KdRUqTaWhxYy+YxX+CAlSwVLbl66moTAOJ/ugP2c4q7Ha6lqa3iE7HTmr5zTej+FLBvy26tUMLE+yAVFbM7xIs0VDxzdl1ean2NALMjSAw9qjT8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=nGGGbrky; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="nGGGbrky" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FF41DBB58; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:30:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=kZHvLfYNvmS2XjWcEzmM7B1IjJBIokxG3iQkhy CjiAs=; b=nGGGbrkyAgND80iFhwQSF7xOukmkgCe75l0C0/ky1LUXZWak9rTs7i lNC/Y8QTXF02uyY/SGOu0sZOYXFgkUyXTTJaXX2XgsLSqyRVLBO0jw43fMuUYJ8c eSFCyMNEqaSN5uTZ23jEVo5eU8kqz+ASbxOS42edz+SRFWD7xHpPs= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED621DBB56; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:30:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 845511DBB53; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:30:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Dragan Simic Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, code@khaugsbakk.name Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] send-email: make it easy to discern the messages for each patch In-Reply-To: <235fa26a0803f7a8868fe908e4689bda@manjaro.org> (Dragan Simic's message of "Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:17:56 +0200") References: <235fa26a0803f7a8868fe908e4689bda@manjaro.org> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:30:05 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 33BF6B62-F3B5-11EE-8BB6-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Dragan Simic writes: > According to my research, the "->ornaments(0)" call should work in > all environments as expected. It's also officially documented. [1] > > [1] https://perldoc.perl.org/Term::ReadLine#ornaments Go back to the DESCRIPTION section and realize that it is a front-end for different implementations. The functions are listed in separate sections, the first section being "Minimal set of supported functions", the other one being "Additional" that may or may not be available/effective for everybody. Which side does ornaments fall in that page?