From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hash-object: fix descriptor leak with --literally
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:26:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtu0n2g67.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8ijpJqtkDTi792i@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:57:56 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> In hash_object(), we open a descriptor for each file to hash (whether we
> got the filename from the command line or --stdin-paths), but never
> close it. For the traditional code path which feeds the result to
> index_fd(), this is OK; it closes the descriptor for us.
>
> But 5ba9a93b39 (hash-object: add --literally option, 2014-09-11) a
> second code path which does not close the descriptor.
A sentence without verb? "5ba9 (hash-...) added a second code path,
which does not close the descriptor." or something?
> After this patch, it completes successfully. I didn't bother with a
> test, as it's a pain to deal with descriptor limits portably, and the
> fix is so trivial.
True. Will queue. Thanks.
> I do think the world would be less confusing if index_fd() didn't close
> the descriptor we pass it, and then hash_file() could just do:
>
> fd = open();
> hash_fd(fd);
> close(fd);
>
> which is much more readable. But it has many other callers. So even if
> we wanted to untangle all that, I think it makes sense to do this
> obvious fix in the meantime.
Indeed, thanks.
> builtin/hash-object.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/hash-object.c b/builtin/hash-object.c
> index b506381502..44db83f07f 100644
> --- a/builtin/hash-object.c
> +++ b/builtin/hash-object.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static int hash_literally(struct object_id *oid, int fd, const char *type, unsig
> else
> ret = write_object_file_literally(buf.buf, buf.len, type, oid,
> flags);
> + close(fd);
> strbuf_release(&buf);
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 1:57 [PATCH] hash-object: fix descriptor leak with --literally Jeff King
2023-01-19 6:26 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-01-19 8:20 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtu0n2g67.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox