From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF20C07E9D for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 22:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232483AbiIWWEQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:04:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35578 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231239AbiIWWEO (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:04:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506C4EDD3B for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0761456FF; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:04:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=EDsg7TaeG9jkKnmGuTVeGs60IT1eZ1rrrpmJMD /lU3U=; b=Hg8FKmC3VSzUZYcQmMM7iXQFqgjMh4TZSDBN/EwdpszZmK5k/3CyWj X86sJD/8P4ZbLlVC+dAr7feaTRJuhFbHF5ul7mvBLSdyHfU+A0gHdMZ6ZZHZ63XC oKYO2aL5c+AfnR1t3JiOHwtsQ5O+eTrEpY3VIoXnV8m3cc/jeiL7Y= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622561456FE; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:04:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C90AE1456FD; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:04:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, derrickstolee@github.com, Victoria Dye Subject: Re: [PATCH] read-cache: avoid misaligned reads in index v4 References: Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:04:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:39:28 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A7B33226-3B8B-11ED-BA2B-307A8E0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Here (and elsewhere), you can assume that the offsetof() "sec" in > cache_time is 0, for two reasons: > > - I didn't look up chapter and verse, but I'm pretty sure the standard > does guarantee that the first field of a struct is at the beginning. https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf 6.7.2.1 #13 (page 103) Within a structure object, the non-bit-field members and the units in which bit-fields reside have addresses that increase in the order in which they are declared. A pointer to a structure object, suitably converted, points to its initial member (or if that member is a bit-field, then to the unit in which it resides), and vice versa. There may be unnamed padding within a structure object, but not at its beginning. As an initial padding is forbidden, the first member's offset is zero.