From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Cc: Orgad Shaneh via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fetch: limit shared symref check only for local branches
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 03:27:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtu9oxxmv.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAGHpTBJDeOMCfv36Sey1tGadQThS8mGR00YiK4C16BbV==W8XQ@mail.gmail.com
Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com> writes:
>> Another thing that is surprising is that you say this loop is
>> expensive when there are many tags or branches. Do you mean it is
>> expensive when there are many tags and branches that are updated, or
>> it is expensive to merely have thousands of dormant tags and
>> branches? If the latter, I wonder if it is sensible to limit the
>> check only to the refs that are going to be updated.
>
> It's expensive even when *nothing* is updated. I have a repo with 44K
> tags, 13K of the tags are annotated, 134 remote branches and 4
> worktrees (except the main repo) with 33 local branches.
>
> I counted the calls to find_shared_symref - it was called 35755 times,
> and refs_read_raw_ref was called 357585 times.
That is exactly why I asked, as the above number hints that it could
be a viable optimization to omit calls for refs whose old_ and
new_oid are the same, just like you omit calls for refs that are not
inside refs/heads/ in your patch, perhaps?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 8:37 [PATCH] fetch: limit shared symref check only for local branches Orgad Shaneh via GitGitGadget
2022-05-16 8:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Orgad Shaneh via GitGitGadget
2022-05-16 16:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-16 17:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-17 6:05 ` Orgad Shaneh
2022-05-17 10:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-05-17 10:41 ` Orgad Shaneh
2022-05-18 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtu9oxxmv.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=orgads@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).