From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8B1C47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5ED61246 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230285AbhFHGoY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:44:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60447 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230254AbhFHGoY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:44:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8CADE477; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:42:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=tHCakM0reDbqm1YTCbMEvL5ORek0qLuVPWeCQf Zgp4A=; b=R67yWK90XWKo3zPK7QnWLjH5E1+TSUOmbmPZ16RpPCJXo/EFWSjtyz Ms5QC5uUEWmrZmLqxUtsmOaFrES8hIoEajmWC5kEfVs5iM8AdsMmHKs64Zgtyfde sDtNQicacsobDT1TJXKtsBruqh5yCifKDur4KruozfxwiBk4QvTTc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4137ADE476; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:42:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92F29DE474; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:42:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters) References: Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:42:29 +0900 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget's message of "Sat, 05 Jun 2021 09:13:28 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B2A07094-C824-11EB-A26E-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" writes: > ZheNing Hu (6): > [GSOC] ref-filter: add obj-type check in grab contents > [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom > [GSOC] ref-filter: use non-const ref_format in *_atom_parser() > [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom and --rest option > [GSOC] ref-filter: teach grab_sub_body_contents() return value and err > [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filters) I haven't gotten around looking at anything after the %(rest) one, but https://github.com/git/git/runs/2770688471?check_suite_focus=true seems to tell us that there is "size_t *" vs "ulong *" type confusion, possibly around the textconv thing.