From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B344AC282DD for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726F8214D8 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="DX2bAAsD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728736AbgAGUPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:15:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54475 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728384AbgAGUPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:15:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD682D863; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:15:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ezvby62mqJV/So7cu+L+gxRNvy4=; b=DX2bAA sDV6Y04kCN43B6/eJd1ObNZdw/B2/SEtgFC7uvhT4YXaG0QhYnk8UH8+JscjVCtE cCVdFhzWmeKBHPFjP/w1H69mVfsThTFv+0oA+cA1+8/cVWErD8LqJSe+qAU6ZE8z F30UcN8aFb40KW2v2Zqc3OYThSIP650O/QjBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bR4dYM4HP4VymSwhQRW4Ph1pYXN06DAn IiU+au5z41OFP2kNiq4V6/hZnI395PUGBeBmwZXBGg2xunsNDeNOvmsXhCUKhajE I7jDBXkpj8niuV3ZRZyVJKcLT17rxZ+vB56ERXh2TXeA8hIhURZC+yfE/ghrHNqb AcbJGXft95c= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120962D862; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:15:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 694942D861; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:15:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Liam Huang via GitGitGadget , Liam Huang , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Update imap-send.c, fix incompatibilities with OpenSSL 1.1.x References: Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:15:17 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:57:36 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6C8A8DA6-318A-11EA-B45D-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >> Of course, I can teach GitGitGadget to not Cc: you. Like, always. Not sure >> that you would like that any better because you would not even be Cc:ed >> once consensus was reached. > > That would actually be better. Somebody in the discussion thread s/better/much much &/; > would probably say "This is good enough---send it to the maintainer" > when the topic is ready. Besides, when they send out patches they would also add area experts and those who participated in the review of the earlier round to Cc: so GGG needs to have a mechanism to allow the end user to do so. And by treating the maintainer merely just one of the reviewer, that mechanism can naturally be reused.