From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:24:59 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20150115090703.GA12333@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20150115224652.GA25482@dcvr.yhbt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , git@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Wong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 16 00:25:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YBtmo-0003mk-Df for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:25:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754063AbbAOXZE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:25:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:55710 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752244AbbAOXZD (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:25:03 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEDB30521; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:25:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=x/XOYB454ykqAQ6bI3VWzVeULsA=; b=O3TrxF FqzGbb4mXIhGJ90hw+bSBa0bfPE1aoLKM2viUPfbD5uk+POl6gIAB5F/ngJoCIx4 QcUIsS75JNxBVKCRBV2wYTmimgPsB1jCOvjGJGv2deXmoAxD810e5NQfNL3FABF0 HMjp9zh0DvFmt65il4rM/INPduA8G4gcrBMIU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=orHT8DyRJ26pijnupg9wq6w5MQhqnpXt n1JEinbrkOV2ea1fim5MEXMMNIE/Fp87Lq7rzbpKtqqRwa4R/+epRWd22cgWq7JY GlEFFl9AMGdkogIM0wb2qRn6g5JyCOcfXBnBQZcq04c6fvq2ldmT1sGCw3rT01t8 V72cPYkvLqA= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023373051F; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:25:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 343993051E; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:25:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20150115224652.GA25482@dcvr.yhbt.net> (Eric Wong's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:46:52 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B99E6B6A-9D0D-11E4-866E-42529F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eric Wong writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Thanks. No tests necessary/feasible? Just being curious. > > They seemed simple and obvious enough to me, > (and most importantly, didn't trigger regressions). I can see that the top-most one is about .git that is a textual symlink ".gitdir: " and the code after this part needed to convert it to the real place in order to be able to read/write "${GIT_DIR}/", so that is obvious to me. But the other one just says "handle missing ref_id case correctly" without clarifying what is incorrect in the original and how the desired correct behaviour is different (in other words, what breaks without this change) To which a natural reaction was "Can the existing breakage demonstrated by a test?". If it is obvious for git-svn folks, then I wouldn't complain, though.