From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Henrique Ferreiro via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Henrique Ferreiro <hferreiro@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees: avoid quadratic index scan in next_cache_entry()
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:30:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7aqzdvq.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2353.git.git.1783458106037.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Henrique Ferreiro via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:01:45 +0000")
"Henrique Ferreiro via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index b42020f16b..ed9fef453a 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -671,8 +671,10 @@ static struct cache_entry *next_cache_entry(struct unpack_trees_options *o)
>
> while (pos < index->cache_nr) {
> struct cache_entry *ce = index->cache[pos];
> - if (!(ce->ce_flags & CE_UNPACKED))
> + if (!(ce->ce_flags & CE_UNPACKED)) {
> + o->internal.cache_bottom = pos;
> return ce;
> + }
> pos++;
Nice spotting.
Does this trick work correctly even when a path's sorting order
differs between the index and tree objects, which is precisely why
.cache_bottom was introduced, to allow backward scanning while
bounding the lookback distance?
> }
> return NULL;
> diff --git a/t/perf/p0009-diff-pathspec.sh b/t/perf/p0009-diff-pathspec.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000..0f1dccfbb4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/perf/p0009-diff-pathspec.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='Tests performance of diffing the working tree with a pathspec'
> +
> +. ./perf-lib.sh
> +
> +test_perf_fresh_repo
> +
> +# The entries exist only in the index, which is enough to
> +# exercise the index scan.
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '
> + count=100000 &&
You will probably want to mimic how t/perf/p4209-pickaxe.sh helps
testers by adjusting the count based on how the EXPENSIVE
prerequisite is configured.
> + blob=$(echo content | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
> + {
> + printf "100644 $blob\taaa/file\n" &&
> + printf "100644 $blob\tf%s\n" $(test_seq $count)
> + } | git update-index --index-info &&
> + git commit -q -m initial &&
> + mkdir -p aaa &&
> + echo content >aaa/file
> +'
> +
> +test_perf 'diff pathspec subtree' '
> + git diff HEAD -- aaa/file
> +'
> +
> +test_done
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 21:01 [PATCH] unpack-trees: avoid quadratic index scan in next_cache_entry() Henrique Ferreiro via GitGitGadget
2026-07-07 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-07-08 18:31 ` Henrique Ferreiro
2026-07-08 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-08 21:40 ` Henrique Ferreiro
2026-07-08 21:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Henrique Ferreiro via GitGitGadget
2026-07-08 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7aqzdvq.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=hferreiro@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox