From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Cc: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Karthik Nayak" <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:33:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7pfudux.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f731776-9a9e-4c8f-8de9-99d470503345@app.fastmail.com> (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Sat, 31 May 2025 14:17:34 +0200")
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:
> On Sat, May 31, 2025, at 05:39, shejialuo wrote:
>> It is reported that "git refs verify" would fail when encountering
>> worktrees created on Git v2.43.0 or older versions. These versions
>
> Nit: maybe
>
> "git refs verify" doesn't work if there are worktrees created on Git
> v2.43.0 ...
Yeah, "It is reported that" was somewhat odd introduction.
>> don't automatically create the "refs" directory, causing the error:
>>
>> error: cannot open directory .git/worktrees/<worktree name>/refs:
>> No such file or directory
The original of this part already reads quite well, I think.
>> Since 8f4c00de95 (builtin/worktree: create refdb via ref backend,
>> 2024-01-08), we automatically create the "refs" directory for new
>> worktrees. However, the fsck code incorrectly assumes all linked
>> worktrees have this directory, thus introducing compatibility issue.
>
> Thanks for finding that commit.
Yup. And that one is v2.44.0-rc0~58^2, and that is where "v2.43" in
the above description comes from.
> At this point in the message it seems like the fsck code never worked
> with these old linked worktrees. But `git refs verify` used to work
> with them until 7c78d819e6a (ref: support multiple worktrees check for
> refs, 2024-11-20) which was part of v2.48.0. So I think it’s worth
> mentioning that commit as well.
Good suggestion.
> Like I said in the first email the only minor regression in this release
> cycle is that git-fsck(1) reports these errors on stderr because the
> default `--reference`. This was how I spotted the issue on rc0. But I
> neglected to mention that the commit that introduced `--references`
> (default) for git-fsck(1) is v2.48.0-rc1-49-gc1cf918d3ad (builtin/fsck:
> add `git refs verify` child process, 2025-02-28).[1]
Thanks for a careful analysis. The "fix" is rather obvious, so
let's see if we can come up with the final wording of the commit log
message and merge it down in time ;-).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 19:00 [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs kristofferhaugsbakk
2025-05-30 22:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-31 1:03 ` shejialuo
2025-05-31 9:52 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-05-31 3:39 ` [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-05-31 12:17 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02 1:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-06-02 11:30 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 9:53 ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-02 10:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-06-02 13:50 ` phillip.wood123
2025-06-02 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-02 12:16 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 12:41 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:59 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02 14:11 ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7pfudux.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).