From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Randall S. Becker" <randall.becker@nexbridge.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] reftable: fix out-of-memory errors on NonStop
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:52:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7vdc726.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241221-b4-pks-reftable-oom-fix-without-readers-v1-0-12db83a3267c@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:50:06 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> this small patch series fixes out-of-memory errors on NonStop with the
> reftable backend. These errors are caused by zero-sized allocations,
> which return `NULL` pointers on NonStop.
Interesting. Git side has long been aware of this issue, but
because being able to get something out of zero-byte allocation was
somehow deemed so useful (and I do not either remember the reasons,
nor if I were asked today, I do not know if I agree), our xmalloc()
and friends ensure that we never return NULL for 0-sized allocation.
I looked at the patches the places they touch and they are sensible
changes to avoid asking 0-sized allocations. Which is the opposite
approach from what Git takes *and* which may be more sensible. The
callers should know better what they want to do when they have zero
sized request. E.g., if they have 0 records to write to in a format
that has num-records followed by an array of entries, they may want
to make it a no-op, or they may want to explicitly write 0 followed
by no entries, to record the fact that such a request was made.
One possible downside of the approach is that all API functions must
be vetted for their response to a request that might end up leading
to a zero-sized allocation and told to special case such a request,
but that is something better donw sooner rather than later.
Will queue. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-21 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-21 11:50 [PATCH 0/4] reftable: fix out-of-memory errors on NonStop Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] reftable/stack: don't perform auto-compaction with less than two tables Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-21 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-22 7:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] reftable/merged: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 12:40 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-12-21 14:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] reftable/stack: " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-21 17:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-21 18:06 ` rsbecker
2024-12-21 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-22 17:48 ` rsbecker
2024-12-22 18:17 ` rsbecker
2024-12-22 18:35 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-23 4:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-22 7:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] reftable/basics: return NULL on zero-sized allocations Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 12:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] reftable: fix out-of-memory errors on NonStop Randall Becker
2024-12-21 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-21 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] reftable/stack: don't perform auto-compaction with less than two tables Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] reftable/merged: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] reftable/stack: " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] reftable/basics: return NULL on zero-sized allocations Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] reftable: fix out-of-memory errors on NonStop Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7vdc726.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=randall.becker@nexbridge.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).