From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: phillip.wood123@gmail.com
Cc: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
stolee@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:00:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7wq91sn.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c623fcf-01dd-4056-80c1-b3c860ab7f87@gmail.com> (phillip's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:48:59 +0000")
phillip.wood123@gmail.com writes:
>> I guess this fails by leaving the "# *** SAY WHY" in the resulting
>> message, because the stripspace wants to see '%' to start commented
>> out lines to be stripped? If we inspect with this test what the
>> temporary file we give to the editor looks like to make sure that
>> '%' is used for commenting, that would be a more direct test, but
>> without going that far, at least can we have a comment describing
>> how this is expected to fail without the fix?
>
> For me something like
>
> GIT_EDITOR="cat >actual" git -c core.commentChar=% revert \
> --edit --reference HEAD &&
> test_grep "^% \*\*\* SAY WHY WE ARE REVERTING THE COMMIT \*\*\*" \
> actual
>
> Would be a more convincing test as it actually checks that the user sees
> the line that we expect strbuf_stripspace() to remove from the final
> message.
Yes, it is a more direct test. If we did that, that would of course
be preferrable.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 17:27 [PATCH] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-10-23 18:44 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 19:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 17:25 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 20:30 ` phillip.wood123
2024-10-31 9:58 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 10:07 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-23 20:43 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 20:51 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:47 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:02 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:48 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:49 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-24 19:58 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-13 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:01 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 10:52 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-25 14:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-26 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-26 11:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-11-27 12:39 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7wq91sn.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).