From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] format-patch: move range/inter diff at the end of a single patch output
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:50:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv82x6fto.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlXbxzFOJ8gVv7r5@tanuki> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 28 May 2024 15:27:35 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> Yeah, that's definitely better. Whether it's preferable over having it
> after the signature separator I don't know. I personally liked that
> version better, but can totally see why others may not like it.
I do not think anybody posted a version that writes inter/range diff
ater the signature mark.
> Hm. By now I've gotten a bit indifferent, to be honest. I'm not a 100%
> sure whether it's an improvement or not, but I don't have a strong
> opinion either way.
I am not sure what two you are comparing. The current version with
inter/range diff that is before the diffstat and the proposed one
that places inter/range diff after the main patch? Between them, I
do have a strong preference.
Or placing the inter/range diff after the main patch, before or
after the signature mark? As a reader of such a patch, I do not
have strong preference myself, either, but the signature mark is a
convention, established and honored for more than a few decades, to
say "no interesting contents come after this line". I do not think
of a strong reason to go against that convention.
We certainly could use the "---" after the main patch before we add
the inter/range diff. I had such a version but its output looked
rather ugly. Because the inter/range diff output are designed to be
very distinct from the usual patch, I'd say something as innocuous
as an extra blank line would be a good choice.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 22:50 [PATCH 0/2] give range-diff at the end of single patch output Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] show_log: factor out interdiff/range-diff generation Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 22:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] format-patch: move range/inter diff at the end of a single patch output Junio C Hamano
2024-05-24 11:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-24 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-27 5:19 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-27 12:59 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-27 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-28 13:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-28 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-29 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-29 14:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-30 20:05 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-24 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] give range-diff at the end of " Dragan Simic
2024-05-23 23:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 23:35 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-24 3:56 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv82x6fto.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).