From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE524F881 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712627376; cv=none; b=MtvIWAiGg3a5h/8hhEDZSPH0FKmaLjZX74vYRawr4kAStamJPGNAgZkej7Wz8qiEUFy/ZHDJ2gOU3tTD8UNLMUuNjV0nAsg7blr/2Qv0ewIa68iEwqsoqmtPnij1wtf2HU8jqmlEHbJe27tptqHmv4YoG+9Y5OTA3HcJI/t74Nk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712627376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MoXnKXzxkfUKuMvR2REL1qOyxBZQDA0dJTZu36iUm+g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BWFA3niTHdUy7Im7htLAH4C1fjMtPaZWrda8dmW1ga2ot+cxnQlo0YeAOLJi5HlcuyMfZfAHGjhAumIFmg7MrQ6hm94Dl54CjES8hZ6XWCoJtnYMfYuVnYhkii7rZ3AW18Il9yClCi2D16WDe6lbwNfuXw8jzSx+9SOTEIzKtxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=HseLgIP8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="HseLgIP8" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136CD1F6B4E; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:49:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MoXnKXzxkfUKuMvR2REL1qOyxBZQDA0dJTZu36 iUm+g=; b=HseLgIP8SNF2UfsmJZN/r2gmjbYQo+07mnhDznk6dNy+of1OTfYcw6 yv2Hex2Pdd5TUZUkcmlgla5FvaJOzocxc1aUxKXjJEfNU/W3Almyv6ofQGdrOpaL 7w/dbRby2pB4tPIGRh1tMZMW/c44I/og+E9oddDhDBd6jLLJfdIXQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A93F1F6B4D; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:49:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.229.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77EF61F6B4C; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:49:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: Linus Arver via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Tan , Emily Shaffer , Patrick Steinhardt , Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] MyFirstContribution: mention contrib/contacts/git-contacts In-Reply-To: (Linus Arver's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:08:13 -0700") References: <3817e7f3cd007fe26b8bfdec6babed1c17ec3795.1712366536.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:49:32 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 69CEFF00-F613-11EE-B2D2-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Linus Arver writes: >> As I prefer not to be too assertive, something like >> >> The `contrib/contacts/git-contacts` script may help you coming >> up people you may want to ask to review your patch by adding >> them to the Cc: header. >> >> is as far as I would go, but for those who are not familiar enough >> with the project, perhaps it would be OK to assume that the script >> would do a much better job than these contributors would do >> themselves, I guess. > > Yeah for newcomers the tool would probably do a better job. Perhaps > wording it like "If you're not sure who to CC, use > `contrib/contacts/git-contacts` to ..." would be better? Sounds reasonable. Thanks.