From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD6F131E54 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708022946; cv=none; b=AqmoV5AtBXnw7FVi7PFi+AxU/9v0PIcnzEPb83RjSsg7d3Rb6RsxA/Uw1sRu4P2oxiGkcm3C6EtI3VORh7pragEkASvBep528FjavzDtKN9WME/I+i1KgrtHtHHCUiX1M+JQ9FtMBlJ8axrgBbDO0pklgfq+bjB1AGK04g00kTE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708022946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dptC4lfb9av2JJGMpDKcpW8gbj0BBYW+XdGI2XuamHw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PnPpKt4Cl+Jnb6BL+JYFr67IHGjEEwUGny4P97t4weThhkPuReYNVHnxt7nOo46VC3mdeLbCJW+FFIxiq1Ir3jvWOvX30RI02Ip/fxIfFyAZJBee+akf84P5BF9g4aeKypi+P5UTG4CnNVE8qZv/op/GdCaAB62+ybx6INJE80Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=hiNAUP9T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="hiNAUP9T" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0E1DEA8F; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:49:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=dptC4lfb9av2JJGMpDKcpW8gbj0BBYW+XdGI2X uamHw=; b=hiNAUP9Tpdniq+LQim8PZ+k+gP/tZh0Qxj9OqO+1A76gxDa5tlxA3A 5bltVZY/3Qr5oC9Crga4j+9St/RF5cn+ngJoZbqwAvGhWF2h7rC7OyNX291wgQKk Tar687IvCeTLw3AChBEIy2R9qrabVUCrCl/7ows/oqWhqyKv5Mt0s= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9811DEA8E; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:49:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.165.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 904191DEA8D; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:49:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: Elia Pinto , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:17:13 +0100") References: <20240215094243.147057-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:49:01 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E32124A6-CC32-11EE-9ED6-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Christian Couder writes: > Perhaps such changes could be accepted when they are made in only one > file as part of a microproject though? Yes, a microproject is not about helping this project, but is about us investing our cycles in helping aspiring developers with small practice material. Even though we may not want to see massive code churn, we can view the cost of reviewing and accepting small changes as a part of the cost to onboard new folks.