From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EF4C77B7C for ; Wed, 10 May 2023 22:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233420AbjEJWpc (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 May 2023 18:45:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229500AbjEJWpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 May 2023 18:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEF535BD for ; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-64115eef620so53700509b3a.1 for ; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:45:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683758730; x=1686350730; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=a3B9Hp0Igb6wHIfS5wmXdbR8fkB5CMNZEKsT0MiJQbA=; b=ZjQ8EM3Bm5pXAtu9mDmJC4NKNOYceLtTPkKVNeiQLcyPfnjmdXc8QzMjhLHIkKgKhg PLZ54UMtzbfjRY3zo6SlOEzwu0IdxqfiZjXgFisOLG9M/+u8uzReZTGFQB6UhGIAKh2Z s34goTwNrd7ueepvW+C5dIoznTZx4IKc5imUjDxlx4qiXmzzgHoWGBe4haa5vvjr6b67 5Pyg0+SdWzwBRYy+Ico10LUtRvvR2tS95AlP77qi+zhIFCXudJrEkDOfuNnlpupQBUAd kfgnn6CR+eI+lg3i889p2ujGHYkkVZ3WDqdgXKf8DYwRvInat8hnnNJlD30htFdaxQuu y/8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683758730; x=1686350730; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=a3B9Hp0Igb6wHIfS5wmXdbR8fkB5CMNZEKsT0MiJQbA=; b=Rc8SriDjLgJ7R3exK34+/PV7osglx5K3sArvqJFJeJMn3K3hzZkGhXLIV28V0/Vn6W MSHQeRr6XW930G4ccVMRMLJzhercgfhtmYmJwyGxsXC792+jApTT80y2rbP+rRs8TNIA nKa+taVkPwUAlIBkxZJ3aNnZsIodTBgQFezTe+a6EDtZdyyy6+8jrIqGSfs+b+C8Ib45 orAr4k3y4492GFRGnV62rXZ2mNc2kg4V5n27lpu6x+4vDKTGcxb6Batb8c3rYFul3NBI qYCjDPnO/uClAw2Ssrkl2CDHWXnWGoS9HSOUDp3/v22D7FUEKxPubmo5QifaT0u9Q2JC tMcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw3okptYQSD0zcv4+gyFbtwHM1Jectv4cOMUSAKXj+ImhERUzk0 WeLPQrsDElCD8ZG2KXJ5tXM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5Mw3PTv+SD05scn8nTa589ecTisf7TRv3jKsTTIDsbK20kG3l0IwyCUJqmbr8LPVdZGnM+QQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1ca:b0:1ad:bccc:af77 with SMTP id e10-20020a17090301ca00b001adbcccaf77mr1593003plh.18.1683758729716; Wed, 10 May 2023 15:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (187.137.203.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.203.137.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ix10-20020a170902f80a00b001a6d4ea7301sm4283376plb.251.2023.05.10.15.45.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 May 2023 15:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , git@vger.kernel.org, Glen Choo , Taylor Blau , Elijah Newren , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] cocci: remove 'unused.cocci' References: <20230420205350.600760-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <230501.864jowjh15.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <230501.865y9chs69.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 15:45:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <230501.865y9chs69.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?= =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 01 May 2023 19:28:50 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > A better way to spot that would be to start parsing the coccinelle logs, > and detect when we have unknown parsing issues, and error on those. But > until then... Until then, I do not think a rather costly test that has found only 4 instances of the mistakes the test was designed to find is a good way to stand in as a replacement. Let's drop it, as it is easy to resurrect if somebody wants to run it from time to time from an old version of Git. Or is it a valid alternative to move it to "pending"? Thanks.