From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13A9C28D13 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235690AbiHVQMh (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:12:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234858AbiHVQMg (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:12:36 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4676B4BF for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4301AB662; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:12:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=OCQsEMfVu/mJ 5y1gKuKKDg5eMmPFa7DQGCv2UgbK7rA=; b=o8HxILtmTp3CsT/RIzophBefGSWo 0WiqxiVglzgI35yazE4l17UBisT0NRA+0/APqXqdigikMeBXaUVMghKX+3lEPblx 0zHrI26VCrqIgXYPwlcaOcOFomqyI4R0XQZL6+yc4/O/k0K/nmZVU048xHxJ/Yj7 7XOfrnOFRWvjPoI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A5A1AB660; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:12:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB5B61AB65E; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:12:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sequencer: do not translate parameters to error_resolve_conflict() References: <09rn6r61-38qo-4s1q-q7qq-p5onp6p87o44@tzk.qr> <4684d54aeb3e00c96ba581c824a04e47b7236db7.1660828108.git.git@grubix.eu> <220818.86v8qp8uid.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <06s6r3s7-27nn-1o9s-1n7p-5413284r8740@tzk.qr> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:12:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:53:56 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 394596E0-2235-11ED-86EF-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > ... We want code contribution to have a high quality, and the > code reviews should meet at least the same bar. I like that one. =C3=86var is not alone, but many of us often throw an unrelated "observation" into a review thread that is a total tangent. While I do not think it is necessarily a bad thing, because these tangential discussions often turn into separate idea that lead to improvements, we should learn to (1) mark a tangent clearly as such and (2) keep the quality of the tangent reasonably high. Thanks.