From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE00C433F5 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DA461247 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355607AbhJAVyv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:54:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:60222 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230318AbhJAVyt (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:54:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3191647EC; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:53:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=BQEafnCh5Jlm BY7Iui6UKjttMn/WTjAH2QQWcIBZnLk=; b=PIEALVRSUyuAswJJDeJ7KY4cdiHs 6LQ6mFo0TlwlXHEEsBM6gIZpn+LRxPEkGpZmdIN/0BNYR3xYtenJe1VDBAZ8VPuM tc5wY6qDcZmlHOewnr1E1HH9TRUDTuAAO06PithbLXTJtRt9w/RPw957qyjdkw99 /sruBz5QtieL7ys= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CE21647EB; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:53:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 216161647E9; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:53:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Thomas Rast , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] fix bug, use existing enums References: Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 14:53:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2021 14:52:36 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F3107CB8-2301-11EC-9A20-F327CE9DA9D6-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > >> This re-roll of the v1[1] should hopefully address all the feedback on >> that version, particularly the motivation for the enum-as-bitfield >> labeling, as expanded on in 02/11. > > Other than [3] and [4] that I am not yet convinced is a good idea, > this round looks good to me. Not 3&4, but 4&5.