From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Subject: bisect-helper: we do not bisect --objects
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 08:16:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqvarq9vzo.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
Ever since "bisect--helper" was introduced in 1bf072e366
("bisect--helper: implement "git bisect--helper"", 2009-03-26),
after setting up the "rev-list $bad --not $good_ones" machinery, the
code somehow prepared to mark the trees and blobs at the good boundary
as uninteresting, only when --objects option was given. This was kept
across a bit of refactoring done by 2ace9727be ("bisect: move common
bisect functionality to "bisect_common"", 2009-04-19) and survives
to this day.
However, "git bisect" does not care about tree/blob object
reachability at all---it purely works at the commit DAG level and
nobody passes (and nobody should pass) "--objects" option to the
underlying rev-list machinery. Remove the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
* Christian, do you recall what we were thinking when we added this
mark_edges_uninteresting() call in this program? If you don't,
don't worry--this was done more than 8 years ago. I am just
being curious and also a bit being cautious in case I am missing
something.
Thanks.
bisect.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
index 30808cadf7..86c5929a23 100644
--- a/bisect.c
+++ b/bisect.c
@@ -634,8 +634,6 @@ static void bisect_common(struct rev_info *revs)
{
if (prepare_revision_walk(revs))
die("revision walk setup failed");
- if (revs->tree_objects)
- mark_edges_uninteresting(revs, NULL);
}
static void exit_if_skipped_commits(struct commit_list *tried,
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 16:16 Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-03-03 23:04 ` bisect-helper: we do not bisect --objects Christian Couder
2017-03-06 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-03 23:27 ` Philip Oakley
2017-03-03 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-05 15:05 ` Philip Oakley
2017-03-06 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqvarq9vzo.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox