From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9150420A17 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751597AbdAWSfj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:35:39 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61110 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751585AbdAWSfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:35:37 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794456170F; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:35:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=of6ThK7NQjigXJHIF2Z8UKY5X6Y=; b=ET8Knl Mvc+vKXYqWlP/Jii/eDexjaat7HY3nH5uXV09kjIFKqWUV3xa5EF7tQIeMV/iu2v CoB95KlwAlMDr218no8bFsaOKpKOC0dRCZEt1fOrX+a5jcNXjOeXY3N6qp/r5nbA dYK2vPFzEt+Fngr5hq/UgiGTCP2GkR45kUN1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ktoWJ5GLTcz5wTmDCbBmSzj3zUQdkR6M radC5KaECu4//xemen5BAGVndcP3yYX6oOxycCUTiW751Bx5kphEg9h8ZAwC5087 91dYex9T+GZmsac9W8WcXgWGZrMFUvF0k1kMuo1oz5Pl3QkQOr7a1PnpKdLLgPj5 6G6718WKig8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE466170E; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:35:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA3D46170B; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:35:30 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Dakota Hawkins Cc: Duy Nguyen , Johannes Schindelin , Stefan Beller , Lars Schneider , git Subject: Re: [RFC] Case insensitive Git attributes References: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:35:29 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Dakota Hawkins's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:25:58 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B7EE8F24-E19A-11E6-9166-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Dakota Hawkins writes: > Apologies for the delayed bump. I think because we're talking about > affecting the behavior of .gitattributes that it would be better to > have a distinct .gitattributes option, whether or not you also have a > similar config option. As I know I am on the To: line of the message I am responding to, let me quicly let you know that I won't be responding to this thread for a while as I don't recall what the discussion was about. I will after I'll dig and find out what the thread was about but it won't happen immediately. Sorry about that.