Re: [PATCH v6] unpack-trees: suggesting 'git checkout -m' with its repercussions

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Arsh Srivastava <arshsrivastava00@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes :
>> The commit message should focus on the "why" and "what" from a user perspective, following the project's standard format (problem description, then solution).
>> Also showed an example for the same.
>> Also, note that "extention" is a typo; it should be "extension".
>> Having said that, I am not sure if we want to suggest "checkout -m" in this situation after all.
>> Pointed out the difference between "stash" and "checkout -m".
>> When advice requires a multi-line warning about potential data loss.
>> The goal of these messages should be to provide a clear, safe next step, not a list of advanced alternatives with caveats.
>>  After all, the users who need such an "it failed, now what should I do to recover?" message the most are relatively inexperienced users and we do not want the advice to be overwhelming.
>> Suggesting this "one-shot" approach to a user who is already in a state of friction (and likely less experienced) might be providing them with a "foot-gun" rather than a helpful tip. Generally, advice that nudges users toward the safest "golden paths" like stashing or committing is preferred.
>> For a microproject, you've successfully demonstrated that you can modify the advice system and update the test suite.
>> it might be better to drop the 'checkout -m' suggestion and instead focus on making the existing 'stash' and 'commit' advice as clear and helpful as possible.

I wonder where this came from, as it is quite unusual to have a
rephrased summary of what you respond to.  Is this LLM-generated
summary that was copied-and-pasted without much human brain effort?

What is more usual is to quote the message you are responding to,
trim the parts you are not going to comment on and not necessary for
bystanders to read in order to understand your response, and then
sprinkle your comments in between the parts of the quoted message,
instead of saying only your thing before the message you are
responding to without trimming (which is highly frowned upon, and
people often tell you not to "top-post").