From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EBA4C97 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2026 05:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772344755; cv=none; b=MSfJedeirJ2X1R0FREKi68RawhjG9BHO9kwf/VcU2gPTayUCEb8XOu74Llk8eCoIUouzPfFMcCIEfHzD4fKKlSexhHYn197+ILJF4VQkPmo3yeXhffbu4M/uw1ql/3DVhlqDgO9bHTX8coGyHUWMb4uDslG+alfSN7pqIti7Qs0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772344755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kMfFhqNzgjJMiOcZQFB3zSfhum4TSOdrmbkk1AKG1w4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jgU7zOXPcAF8KV9qpWqMbr6T5vdSjKQNgESuDLOE+aoGBmc2rxLeQwUWeHmagtMD30jlyVtVJxiTHtd36HX7ou4V7hn2tG9U8hkHXJnQ+rOS7FdMzOdCnlxuIbi8l1HbrzEHvusd2qN5fuG8PGv7jlhfMeOQnQCk9uZk2TR4UT0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=ca74SsjO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ZtngNfDh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ca74SsjO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ZtngNfDh" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B761D000D3; Sun, 1 Mar 2026 00:59:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Mar 2026 00:59:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1772344751; x=1772431151; bh=mTwZ9lCSN4 qL89x8UBvWQrR7HW/G3RZitzFfa4aHBGI=; b=ca74SsjOBjlapKdy6WIO/alXCE uDHVDRFVdf2t0BQkvQ72ohFKSc3Aq/HOd4VI0SveuMOeCVXUoBY9mY76UdS8FlDn FUGMeq7/vGaRQjMg2sVYcTAYUEniYNQ54USIulpyVapcIxaqOL1SBIoM92EARzSY kRoXPj0IZ5OscZMyj0Z8SsKtZkXVqHR/yNc2w8vUCIyckBrVGpaqebi7Qg377nYp U7kYXg9m7UcxfcFstf7zhoJh1LW7YvaKtQlDIbdCb2YTGFrefRPIuNfhc49TTxYM CSvOhnR696TYDiOpyp0zic95/5XKL5oX7ji1nzK8nJUzm3dNFMhXq4Tc4bRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1772344751; x=1772431151; bh=mTwZ9lCSN4qL89x8UBvWQrR7HW/G3RZitzF fa4aHBGI=; b=ZtngNfDhgbTvnD66FFNMSkodCyrC7sQdLf79Jr8rFsjQjmZwQqu QXUQimfKPKO9doMH4WMVta+DfQKjTZI4UdFV34HJBVus0/jUxbS6bOhfY3iAKMBc VgKyVS4nZxl5oubVonrMUt0QWCg9XBlGOHE/3Fbkp8+554bhblsVFPC4gjPBL9NQ duhnkbeuM90ALTCdCHW/JBoL/2Kuofp61WWpSxhJFsvJyWVMTpZ5sqb/arCBEoxd yZnQZeYv7Mm5/qO/7E2dSniexjMaYGm83wKDW7tUHpVH7PCOM5GUG2+s/oBo7i0N hcYjitBQQsJYuU84xIgcAbL6vMzWAeMVwMQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvheegtdduucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertd dtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehp ohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeive ffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghrtghn rghrtgesgihiphhlihhnkhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhigsehkvghrnhgvlhdroh hrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthht ohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 1 Mar 2026 00:59:11 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Marc Branchaud Cc: Alejandro Colomar , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: --no-decorate and %d in git-log(1) In-Reply-To: (Marc Branchaud's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:46:10 -0700") References: <8f6441ab-5c9a-4b42-ab2e-a670d462569d@xiplink.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 21:59:09 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Marc Branchaud writes: > Given this documented connection between %d/%D and --decorate, it seems > reasonable for a reader to assume that --decorate=auto would do the same > thing regardless of whether or not a --format=...%d... was present. > ... > I note that currently --decorate has no effect at all if the --format > doesn't contain %d or %D. To me this bolsters the argument for making > --decorate=no suppress %d/%D. OK, that's convincing enough. I no longer mind cooking such a change a bit longer than usual in 'next' to see if anybody screams, and the have it graduate to a released version to further see what happens. Thanks.