git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  mlell08@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] submodule: prevent overwriting .gitmodules entry on path reuse
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 08:41:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwmacobf0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250518075436.75139-1-jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com> (K. Jayatheerth's message of "Sun, 18 May 2025 13:24:35 +0530")

K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com> writes:

> When a submodule is added, Git writes submodule.<name>.active = true
> to the repository configuration to mark it as active. This happens even
> when the submodule path already matches a pattern in submodule.active.
> This results in redundant configuration entries that are unnecessary
> and clutter the config, especially when pattern-based activation is used.
>
> Avoid writing the submodule.<name>.active entry if the path is already
> covered by a pattern in submodule.active.

This explains why the part of the change that deals the .active bit
makes sense.

But now do we drop the other fix from the patch, namely "ouch, we
are adding submodule at 'foo/' but the name 'foo' is taken by a
different submodule that used to live there and moved elsewhere", or
have you forgotten to describe that fix in the proposed log message?

Stepping back a bit, perhaps this patch addresses two independent
issues, both of which can trigger with"submodule add"?  If so, would
it make sense to have it in two separate patches?

> +test_expect_success 'submodule add fails when name is reused' '
> +	git init test-submodule &&
> +	(
> +		cd test-submodule &&
> +		git commit --allow-empty -m "initial commit" &&
> +
> +		git init ../child-origin &&
> +		git -C ../child-origin commit --allow-empty -m "initial commit" &&
> +
> +		git submodule add ../child-origin child &&
> +		git commit -m "Add submodule child" &&
> +
> +		git mv child child_old &&
> +		git commit -m "Move child to child_old" &&
> +
> +		# Create another submodule repo
> +		git init ../child2-origin &&
> +		git -C ../child2-origin commit --allow-empty -m "initial commit" &&
> +
> +		test_must_fail git submodule add ../child2-origin child
> +	)
> +'

The test seems to be about "the other issue".  Shouldn't we also
have a test about "we no longer add redundant configuration entries"?

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-19 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-10  5:45 [PATCH] submodule: prevent overwriting .gitmodules entry on path reuse K Jayatheerth
2025-05-10  5:57 ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-12 12:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-12 13:26   ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-13  3:34     ` [PATCH v2] " K Jayatheerth
2025-05-13 21:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-14  2:01         ` [PATCH v3] " K Jayatheerth
2025-05-14 22:47           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-16  8:51             ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-16 17:49               ` [PATCH v4] " K Jayatheerth
2025-05-16 17:53                 ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-18  7:54                   ` [PATCH v5] " K Jayatheerth
2025-05-18  7:58                     ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-19 15:41                     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-20  1:31                       ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-20 15:28                         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-24  6:48                           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Avoid submodule overwritten and skip redundant active entries K Jayatheerth
2025-05-24  6:48                             ` [PATCH v6 1/2] submodule: prevent overwriting .gitmodules entry on path reuse K Jayatheerth
2025-05-24  6:48                             ` [PATCH v6 2/2] submodule: skip redundant active entries when pattern covers path K Jayatheerth
2025-05-24  6:54                               ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-24  7:30                                 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] Avoid submodule overwritten and skip redundant active entries K Jayatheerth
2025-05-24  7:30                                   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] The seventeenth batch K Jayatheerth
2025-05-24  7:33                                     ` JAYATHEERTH K
2025-05-24  7:30                                   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] submodule: prevent overwriting .gitmodules entry on path reuse K Jayatheerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqwmacobf0.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com \
    --cc=mlell08@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).