From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693A780604 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.154 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736356173; cv=none; b=OWoVXOsx/MDqglHnZOK4hCEpjTX6u6sB1ajISrr/TGGVnIG4DRLDk3v24BJ0lyd8+JRx1bO/aqi3KrBVJbUPFtvjxE1azzoSgnzMc/jXXKNdo2fhCcWiChZXggtXBTet2vJ95peeopTh+6ywoc6eumoq7xp3a9DF8p9l2PVTxMA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736356173; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dhuf7kOQcQA69IS0jZePYrV9JDYLsHzTTNwF3NtyV9k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QABjNIjpNebRGylAFCBQfNpkprhOAzeg/IJSvXqedURwEW58aHLCt7VWyW2gMQwQIEfCcQ7dUoC2oxN3fEJgzjUpD2rmSi13jk9CSLtq/BCyublXKAVjFV5Quo+Zu4SrJoeCGfZE7cMkp9tYv41HXrDknKgk05cf3UqyIo3AI9c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=El/uQzeI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=STuVC/Ph; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.154 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="El/uQzeI"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="STuVC/Ph" Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0CF25400EC; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:09:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 08 Jan 2025 12:09:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1736356170; x=1736442570; bh=H8RuchrrtG HYeQQbIUFuy92SIdFf0l9NIMDlK4LRpK4=; b=El/uQzeIVQoa9Hj8YCgYHs/Tbx Wlmbo95+/3hLmUzcSoH4E/u5YVSwSpV+0LwWME3K+URMZf15kiFCe/ulvL3S8z0S nCnyUIM2gs/pnjt6y5h7+CQsSgp+RupHlVe/V0hto8NF6VrQiwP2y678DYMCZYD8 HZDu5PR8An+q0FuS1oji3Wy4TGyJPRrHrGYMNEKEcFmP9fbhdt1X6i4E0umDwv/X YHDuxvlBpm0HuG5KJx46+SXdysVZl2Jfu0Ex6D72U5aqagvqu7TNXQT9e8CsAAgR sxDXknk81zDkskhGqMjrJEw7YiFTYUDYhZOdJAQAT9UD6fRD17RXBQ/tjsRQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1736356170; x=1736442570; bh=H8RuchrrtGHYeQQbIUFuy92SIdFf0l9NIMD lK4LRpK4=; b=STuVC/PhFxJ3H1X+XwhCuPvKd2rLy8vLAXnlxRTC84pUMwHaBHS /ba1SDKXEuevrU954LBWo1IyAJrqcbc44okWWj0FbFVwUHI/V3OrrFDzsA7NXHkT 1d7BjbDqDKa/OAsvi6H3Ol7oePzBIIrj2jC318Z+ivo2l0DeqrJ2XHk5ljLD4ufX Sp6tCSYTzTBGEz2u/IXFiJkUOkvnn+BgR3VikhD+uUc99moF/mQo1Zu5PGm5jRfm 0clJF8Blfd4J5Df9tZwf2vACee5mZHuVkA8dU5vcj4LPe29PtkUiEgS5JRLqVKuw 1jtPYsfddEgw1G74BSl2vlApY9YZdjr0IDg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudeggedgleeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertden ucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogi drtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeej leeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghp thhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimh dprhgtphhtthhopehrshgsvggtkhgvrhesnhgvgigsrhhiughgvgdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtth hopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhdrkhhn ohgslhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogi drtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:09:29 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: rsbecker@nexbridge.com, 'Christian Couder' , git@vger.kernel.org, "'D. Ben Knoble'" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2025 07:36:14 +0100") References: <20250106-pks-remote-branches-deprecation-v2-0-2ce87c053536@pks.im> <20250106-pks-remote-branches-deprecation-v2-5-2ce87c053536@pks.im> <006701db6124$f16f9420$d44ebc60$@nexbridge.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 09:09:28 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:55:16AM -0500, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote: > >> I like this but wonder whether there might be some way to inhibit the >> warnings one a user gets it and decides they will act but do not want >> to see the warnings any longer? I have had requests like this on other >> products. Just a thought. > > I guess the best idea I have here is to use an environment variable, > e.g. "GIT_ALLOW_DEPRECATED_REMOTES=true", along with a hint for how to > enable it. Hmph. I may be missing something, but wouldn't the whole point of the warning be noisy and pesky as long as the user _uses_ that configuration? It is not like "you can set this knob and delay the removal past Git 3.0". If the user migrates away from the mechanism that is being removed, we would stop bugging the user about the stale setting, so I do not see why we want to add anything extra (other than possibly telling them how to migrate away from $GIT_DIR/{branches,remotes}/ using "git remote" in the warning message itself). Thanks.