Re: [PATCH 2/2] grep: prefer UNUSED to MAYBE_UNUSED for pcre allocators

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 04:09:53PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>> We prove custom malloc/free callbacks for the pcre library to use. Those
>> take an extra "data" parameter, but we don't use it. Back when these
>> were added in 513f2b0bbd (grep: make PCRE2 aware of custom allocator,
>> 2019-10-16), we only had MAYBE_UNUSED. But these days we have UNUSED,
>> which we should prefer, as it will let the compiler inform us if the
>> code changes to actually use the parameters.
>> 
>> I also moved the annotations to come after the variable name, which is
>> how we typically spell it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
>> ---
>> Where "how we typically spell it" is "me", because I wrote 99% of the
>> annotations we have. ;) I'm open to debate, but only if it is
>> accompanied by a patch to change all of them to be consistent.
>
> I don't care about the order, but if we settle on one I think we should
> also document this accordingly in our code style guide.

Very true.  I think Peff's [PATCH 7/6] was sufficient by ending the
new instruction with

	... like "int foo UNUSED".

when it talked about the -Werror=unused-parameter.

Thanks.