From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F925C38A2D for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234419AbiJZUxW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:53:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39124 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233706AbiJZUxU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:53:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5216E5852A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d24so15388679pls.4 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YHzkaFlwQgnnYDkTnVzofbKmn2z+9GQ+a2ti8s8hgq4=; b=cO6hyN1qP4HnNF06pxWAw+RLKs248IhWC5iGj6g/kTkaLoTvB9Rg4+ur0ke22r+VWW Tlfc4iHhbodLstZMmdEqPwGV5WMnIq5KOb9rmlyzC8j9fClOysP/I5csGgWiGC/VeJ5/ Ahh/twdb/Q4c2PfQ42Sf/dS3Vwzzn0ygwqTf+HzW2uTPF7IADLQFEwCRYq13VxvrgdvD w+tZQl1sbjQb+7sNWgDxjFfNnIVFL4VExfWBafAlS4pxHtFTbmW2FeGQrjMaS0FakJF6 iVfatiyM8h4+lTm58yK+giGuehPXECYnQm379UVx6+/QshnHOJ4mofiGJIrhxbXUAV2t V3cA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YHzkaFlwQgnnYDkTnVzofbKmn2z+9GQ+a2ti8s8hgq4=; b=00degBvZQwcV1KgpHo6cCRTbWVzooqIG3IbROXGj0cnoyVzTf51lUrVVz6dvrAb1gZ MHwx+31jtiWpmS7n6taKDSH4Q5e6e5Ta5VhHlq23Bq1jN95mITrrF8+rpIr83+hvMk81 KnTc7U8q7EirqiMm6fDDKewI8tNo/ee2ejBLX7FJp1G0qRwJExNV1ZIohTCbZ69ra8us OBuuQHl3zSUKdrjO3f0NiG3nrs8Bf/X5hq8EhTm7rAeaLBwEa9jzldUvZx6LsT6jOuot 2C/VTszrHXkU/uMOGrRUrpbj7U1C5TDy9d23aUTz5pMGXbm+lQsa4i9dyNdi2GvYste4 +Z9g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf02L4nHJ6k+Z4EDXYF8b7N0hytb99wXlz2PCC/2ebStL06aQ14c cf7pF+mq+eUkpuWyrx34aes= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6Uuj+HWMaGiQ/wr/6174IYihHCtsYjTwVvNpsszypACoe0+BoULURT/9WoAJjPPYUX7U9KnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b04:b0:213:63e7:d0cc with SMTP id lx4-20020a17090b4b0400b0021363e7d0ccmr2773220pjb.12.1666817597704; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e7-20020a056a0000c700b005672daedc8fsm3410848pfj.81.2022.10.26.13.53.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau , Emily Shaffer Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gc: let feature.experimental imply gc.cruftPacks References: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:53:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:13:34 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > This is a moderately-sized reroll of Emily's series from [1], which I > saw while sifting through old mail in my inbox. > > That series was sent when I was on vacation, which is a likely > explanation for why I most likely missed it. > > I'm sending a reroll out on Emily's behalf, since the series hasn't > received any activity in a few months, and I would like to see the > topic pushed forward. Yeah, it has been quite a while. I'd prefer to at least see an Ack by the original author before proceeding. In my quick scan of the original round https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220803205721.3686361-1-emilyshaffer@google.com/ the new round appears to address all the points raised. It was so long time ago that I am not sure if reviewers stopped after seeing minor points that need to be addressed, or there were only minor issues in the original series, though. Thanks.