From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] CodingGuidelines: various C99 updates
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:15:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwn9bebzs.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk05bfrk7.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:54:00 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This series:
>>
>> * Rephrases CodingGuidelines so that we note we're on C99, and then
>> lists exceptions and features we use. The previous prose assumed
>> C89 by default.
>>
>> We still explicitly avoid opening the "feel free to use an C99
>> feature" floodgates.
>
> The above contradicts with each other. A sensible position to
> support the "we do not open the floodgate" is that when in doubt
> stick to C89 but use C99 features that are explicitly allowed.
Ah, I think I misread the intention, which 1/5 clarified. I think
"even though we require your CC claim to support C99, you are
expected to stick to C89 plus those features that are explicitly
allowed" is a very sensible thing to day.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 9:30 [PATCH 0/5] CodingGuidelines: various C99 updates Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] CodingGuidelines: update for C99 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] CodingGuidelines: mention dynamic C99 initializer elements Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] CodingGuidelines: allow declaring variables in for loops Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] CodingGuidelines: mention C99 features we can't use Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] CodingGuidelines: recommend against unportable C99 struct syntax Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-07 17:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] CodingGuidelines: various C99 updates Junio C Hamano
2022-10-07 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-10-10 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] CodingGUidelines: " Junio C Hamano
2022-10-10 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] CodingGuidelines: update for C99 Junio C Hamano
2022-10-10 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] CodingGuidelines: mention dynamic C99 initializer elements Junio C Hamano
2022-10-10 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] CodingGuidelines: allow declaring variables in for loops Junio C Hamano
2022-10-10 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] CodingGuidelines: mention C99 features we can't use Junio C Hamano
2022-10-10 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] CodingGuidelines: recommend against unportable C99 struct syntax Junio C Hamano
2022-10-11 0:09 ` Jeff King
2022-10-11 0:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-11 0:39 ` Jeff King
2022-10-11 8:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-11 15:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqwn9bebzs.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).