From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68883C04A68 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231522AbiG1Roc (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:44:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50630 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229883AbiG1Roa (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:44:30 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48183747B1 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E807D19CF22; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:44:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=IQSX2GzfoeLC fpVRS+m6DVJAP8AOpbJQ7v4F6agUnj8=; b=ZgM4ihhV9aFOxYtaZHnVmYxKFLa4 yTgSUa9bsgz5JdPMF7Azqsoslb0EljhuxzxovJCrRAKFZEboXr2IKOWj35LeRvY1 JTQMhHurUxi16zvoUXHZAORooKkLl+j74aDKbhvjDmtL6YXWgYqeBB0X0pWHFrWf iDGZob+r0RruF80= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E091D19CF21; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:44:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.105.40.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD4919CF20; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:44:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Eugen Konkov , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: Re* --creation-factor=100 does not show code References: <1196830250.20220726145447@yandex.ru> <7229p500-p2r4-on87-6802-8o90s36rr3s4@tzk.qr> <220728.86k07xjh11.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:44:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <220728.86k07xjh11.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?= =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:12:45 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC8B106A-0E9C-11ED-8EF6-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > That algorithm section also says: > > The cost of an edge o--C is the size of C's diff, modified by a > fudge factor that should be smaller than 100%. > > Which I find quite confusing to follow, isn't that "fudge factor" the > (or ) we're accepting with --creation-factor? Doesn't > that also need to be adjusted? > > I still find this documentation quicke lacking, if the default is 60 an= d > it's not 0..100 what is it then? Are values of 200 sensible in some > cases, 1k? 10k? I think 90% of your responses are better answered not by me. Feel free to edit "to:" header field when that happens next time ;-) Thanks.