From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DA1C433F5 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238063AbiAJRNi (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:13:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:52720 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238060AbiAJRNb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:13:31 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E81E1852DF; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:13:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SjFINrSLUSCWN/T1CqImY1DZ2OPOSrUZq9Qd8y QVU04=; b=GqqgWGsxgvTJ/T568gwxTE2/JF37YwStbwpE0sP0TXOadi8BAvejn9 dSA2drLEAUD9Lgf/5HQx3Gk779LzxL1jq6HF51lXE3bwYpcE03TWSaSc+9xXa4R8 ecGQAwFDNJX9sBlXUsrINUvv7SuyApsw/hmNpB3E6IX5kgW1RI8vM= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060411852DE; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:13:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EF9B1852DD; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:13:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2?= =?utf-8?B?YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Emily Shaffer , git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, steadmon@google.com, chooglen@google.com, calvinwan@google.com, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why GitGitGadget does not use Sender:, was Re: Review process improvements References: <20211217183942.npvkb3ajnx6p5cbp@meerkat.local> <211222.86ee65pb60.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <20211222154534.b2gb22ghn2mpyeur@meerkat.local> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:13:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:03:01 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A0E49236-7238-11EC-BAA1-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Konstantin gave a more generally applicable answer to think about this issue in <20211222213247.5dnj3zlj53lh6l32@meerkat.local> in a separate thread last year. I would not be surprised if GMail pays attention to the reasoning he gave in that message and that is the reason why it does not use the "Sender" as I hoped. I expect other e-mail providers should do the same. Thanks.