From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43166C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F5C20747 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="br1rK0oH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726957AbgFKA1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:27:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56680 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726912AbgFKA1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:27:17 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E962E98; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:27:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=G4TIY6wUKNrR2i6Un5ywX5ey5Lg=; b=br1rK0 oHFh7sZCiQQnOWepLOZ6sJfcs/EMjpoGId9BM3QtAISzy7B2uKNIA7IeN6ie+xq8 CIvvO8Saj0vk/F29Lo9lnI5IZCoONU+uKWVEYF5O4wfPA411v4f1kQm0SevvFa3m p0u3i5dHazA+9lyaeBH1ZArc2nPEgcONPUePI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RZPShMRBj+40oS8al7I5Yh1d9cYMwbFc +bR16aRg+sz1UOas+c7cLv9nA4+mF0878L9FzuUmmF+TIZMWZTEj1ff0I5s5OzYF 8055oFwvwLofrN5E0nXw77GXFVnJ3ydAb8+wNo8EbPHXlTUzN056LRlx7uXB4sCR JHu/aqeCXUw= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB60D62E97; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:27:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C62762E96; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:27:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2020, #02; Wed, 10) References: <20200610235713.GX6569@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:27:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200610235713.GX6569@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:57:13 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4CE486AE-AB7A-11EA-ABCA-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > On 2020-06-10 at 23:36:30, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * bc/sha-256-part-2 (2020-05-27) 44 commits >> ... >> - t1050: match object ID paths in a hash-insensitive way >> >> SHA-256 migration work continues. > > I assume you're waiting for something on this, and it's probably a > review, but I didn't see a comment to that effect. Am I correct? More or less. It actually is weaker; I didn't have enough energy to give attention to the topic between issue #1 and issue #2 this month to even bother adding such a comment. By default nothing happens without input, and I try not to be the only reviewer of a large topic like this one---I always prefer to have second sets of eyes. Thanks for working on it. A large refactoring like this one, the sooner we can absorb it, the less blocking it would be for other topics in flight.