From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6877D264A9D for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.159 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773863158; cv=none; b=s5Vl2b+TFY+Zhb1cWb9J1PAUBgNdWmsHPMdKoo+1Cd1qy+Jh3eBGbtoJCqd3OUBJtmNqSesTNOnyk9uFzec9GZ6Ma7RqB2EYdA9UKWK0I45NuVX8KLwarfBfufUf+clRH9S4nQcSR/zrkkYjt9j7JF4FAyVfkjPGBDNnJPP5S/Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773863158; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kmEqwRxiAFtIlNEcAsUrXLW6q8jpLtTvaY/eBUhJXxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JBC0gDkhAyBax+OoNjcfc5KnvTBmQYk1GY+n+ockbIJF9o8DU5mi4WH19aioUOjLixY2+6i2ffurEkXJY9l1lXg3PIEt4xBMLuIesVUOwE0+/m27PvOT9WnRZEqbw0IL0aHEQBZTu8H/NtdlMG01k5P6OMGt/iXoM2TaOIeATzc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=OadNiuUf; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=a1v9a8WG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.159 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="OadNiuUf"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="a1v9a8WG" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C01C7A00E8; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:45:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:45:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1773863156; x=1773949556; bh=4tMeMYu5yL Py5XRLyVYn5EWqYqYZRfJaX/9qSm2lk/I=; b=OadNiuUf9upjB8XjNv3Whj+vkV zrNIlQwhYqWbkxThlhdrWDOqFpzEBeKfdBpE494iiEIpfcxHFK2zGzkznn0kHCW/ 8qGPqrLwpsxEtTegiUslBusbXNHCizMKsn+e0GqVyJ6QZXFebX7SVUCb9LJ6ybsB 5j0I6A0RaDNiRI0pH8tpvYnh8DsL4YstuLOD9HMp6ZAmDxUAObYRA06lRsGa40VW MRyeWsvOB4V7PeOsbN+MTSOIk43OaRTOFZN+NuX9IK8jfnZfn72ZvUPn/MxWLz2N G8xHWhOJDYcLvkpWNUttdkPCMcOkvcg5H2H8crG2COLIuHun/x0okUu8qRVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1773863156; x=1773949556; bh=4tMeMYu5yLPy5XRLyVYn5EWqYqYZRfJaX/9 qSm2lk/I=; b=a1v9a8WGhWJh9Mv3bT03Uz7oTJxZuU5+xMnlN8m2MmQxoqcvoto SX5Tu2CA17zsU4kFfqwW9BICkrrbmMxmm7qxJsrMx00lcBuFCmvoeVE8eP/wd/D3 2I1OR3vprWSyxMtMPoR1zB5qaNKTRVpPWZibUUzuZN27lyX4m49WXbvNPalxai9b AKF7oaMEr5rPwg1fwkR9lfkIxQz6SjzrH/nfDDFtU+72/wHeEGDXHYyeZKjG/4mL ZcHPn93htLZw0pSbd1Eb2aTEAZ0JEsE2Ps5UyhO4Fo5yr6MrS8lIBoNgU0SCtpFy uE/gOHAjESWNmbrvckwmcsnNHJYkhgIvapQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdeftdehtddtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddtpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmsehgihhtrdhsthhrohhvrgdrughkpdhrtghpth htohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhilhhl ihhprdifohhougesughunhgvlhhmrdhorhhgrdhukhdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhnhgtrg hikeeisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprghvrghrrggssehgmhgrihhlrdgt ohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthhhprghsthgvrd hnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehkrghrthhhihhk rddukeeksehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrihhsthhofhhfvghrhhgruh hgshgsrghkkhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:45:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Mathias Rav" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Phillip Wood" , "John Cai" , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , "brian m. carlson" , "Patrick Steinhardt" , "Karthik Nayak" , "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] merge-file: fix BUG when --object-id is used in a worktree In-Reply-To: <94dd3222-42bc-42af-8d97-5bd471a86fcd@app.fastmail.com> (Mathias Rav's message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:16:06 +0000") References: <86e5c9f7-cd99-4c4f-a852-f3b1ada53722@app.fastmail.com> <94dd3222-42bc-42af-8d97-5bd471a86fcd@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:45:54 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Mathias Rav" writes: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2026, at 6:44 AM, Mathias Rav wrote: >> Thanks Karthik, Patrick, Kristoffer and Junio for your feedback. >> I've incorporated the sum of it all in this PATCH v2: >> >> - Check !repo before object_id and add a comment >> - Use term "linked worktree" instead of just "worktree" throughout >> - Use git -C instead of a subshell in test >> - Remove gitk's quotes from the commit references in the commit message > > I'm unsure of the process from here for a small bugfix like this. > I believe I followed the SubmittingPatches document > by sending a PATCH v2 with To: Junio, Cc: list and others. > Do I need to do anything else to see this patch eventually land in Junio's tree? Pinging like this was absolutely the right thing to do in this case, as the patch fell through the cracks. Will apply (assuming that everybody involved in the review is now happy with this iteration). Thanks.