public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: do not loop infinitely when processing packs
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:49:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy0kjo3yr.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223071215.GA136463@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2026 02:12:15 -0500")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Having to identify each potential spot and set a "btw, don't switch the
> pack list order!" flag seems error-prone. And also loses efficiency when
> you are iterating a pack and accessing objects in it (since we can't
> push that pack to the front of the MRU then, even though we'd expect
> there to be high locality with our iteration).

Ah, you said so clearly what I was feeling but I couldn't form into
words.  Using a stable second list to stably iterate over it for a
codepath like the fsck does sound a lot less error prone.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-22 18:37 [PATCH] fsck: do not loop infinitely when processing packs brian m. carlson
2026-02-22 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-22 23:07   ` brian m. carlson
2026-02-23  7:12     ` Jeff King
2026-02-23  8:46       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-23  9:25         ` Jeff King
2026-02-23  9:36           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-23  9:46             ` Jeff King
2026-02-23 15:49       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-23  8:43 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-23  9:27   ` Jeff King
2026-02-23  9:53   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-24 22:23   ` brian m. carlson
2026-02-24 22:32     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqy0kjo3yr.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox