From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Cc: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, shejialuo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GSOC PATCH v2 2/2] attr: use `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()` and update callers
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:08:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy0xc4h7b.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZT=zGTF2DLEy9VjXhcUN3wEi7_R=8O6nV-TtBXKT=ENXg@mail.gmail.com> (Karthik Nayak's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:17:06 -0700")
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
> Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Update attribute-related functions to retrieve the "core.attributesfile"
>> configuration via the new repository-scoped accessor
>> `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()`. This improves behaviour in
>> multi-repository contexts and aligns with the goal of minimizing
>> reliance on global state.
>>
>
> We should also talk about the modifications made to pass around the
> repository struct.
Yes. We first should justify if it makes sense to cram attribute
set into the repository object and pass it around in the first
place. Many index-state related functions do not pass repository
around because they work on index-state, so index-state is passed
around instead. Perhaps the attribute subsystem should be the same
way, in that their globals should belong to its own abstraction that
is smaller scale than a repository object (it is permissible to have
such an attribute-set object know about which repository instance it
is related to, though).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 15:33 [PATCH] environment: move access to "core.attributesfile" into repo settings Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 7:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-10 9:07 ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 17:21 ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 19:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 15:10 ` [GSOC PATCH v2 0/2] Stop depending on `the_repository` for core.attributesfile Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 15:10 ` [GSOC PATCH v2 1/2] environment: move access to "core.attributesfile" into repo settings Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 21:11 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-03-10 15:10 ` [GSOC PATCH v2 2/2] attr: use `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()` and update callers Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 21:17 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-03-10 23:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-03-11 17:41 ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-11 14:39 ` shejialuo
2025-03-11 17:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-11 17:20 ` Ayush Chandekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy0xc4h7b.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).