From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Monika Kairaitytė via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Monika Kairaitytė" <monika@kibit.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] documentation: add missing word "ref"
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 11:36:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy137wtyz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1803.git.1727623027242.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> ("Monika Kairaitytė via GitGitGadget"'s message of "Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:17:07 +0000")
"Monika Kairaitytė via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:
> When explaining about "the destination ref <dst>", word
> "ref" is included. Logically, it should be the same in the explanation
> of "the source <src>".
"Logically", if <src> and <dst> followed the same rules, but
otherwise, it is not a logical conclusion.
What makes me hesitate with this change is the following.
- In "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*", <src> is "refs/heads/*"
and <dst> is "refs/tags/*". Neither is a ref. So it could be
argued that saying "ref" before <dst> is what is wrong in the
current text, and adding "ref" before <src> makes it doubly
wrong.
- In addition, <src> can be a fully spelled object name, to fetch
just a single object. In such a case, it does not even remotely
resemble a ref.
How about this text instead? Would it solve the problem, i.e.
> In the git-fetch documentation, description of <refspec> syntax is not
> entirely clear.
Thanks.
------- >8 -------
Subject: doc: clarify <src> in refspec syntax
We explicitly avoid saying "ref <src>" when introducing the source
side of a refspec, because it can be a fully-spelled hexadecimal
object name, and it also can be a pattern that is not quite a "ref".
But we are loose when we introduce <dst> and say "ref <dst>", even
though it can also be a pattern. Let's omit "ref" also from the
destination side.
Clarify that <src> can be a ref, a (limited glob) pattern, or an
object name.
Even though the very original design of refspec expected that '*'
was used only at the end (e.g., "refs/heads/*" was expected, but not
"refs/heads/*-wip"), the code and its use evolved to handle a single
'*' anywhere in the pattern. Update the text to remove the mention
of "the same prefix". Anything that matches the pattern are named
by such a (limited glob) pattern in <src>.
Also put a bit more stress on the fact that we accept only one '*'
in the pattern by saying "one and only one `*`".
Helped-by: Monika Kairaitytė <monika@kibit.lt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git c/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt w/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
index c718f7946f..d79d2f6065 100644
--- c/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
+++ w/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
@@ -25,14 +25,15 @@ endif::git-pull[]
+
The format of a <refspec> parameter is an optional plus
`+`, followed by the source <src>, followed
-by a colon `:`, followed by the destination ref <dst>.
+by a colon `:`, followed by the destination <dst>.
The colon can be omitted when <dst> is empty. <src> is
-typically a ref, but it can also be a fully spelled hex object
+typically a ref, or a glob pattern with a single `*` that is used
+to match a set of refs, but it can also be a fully spelled hex object
name.
+
A <refspec> may contain a `*` in its <src> to indicate a simple pattern
match. Such a refspec functions like a glob that matches any ref with the
-same prefix. A pattern <refspec> must have a `*` in both the <src> and
+pattern. A pattern <refspec> must have one and only one `*` in both the <src> and
<dst>. It will map refs to the destination by replacing the `*` with the
contents matched from the source.
+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-29 15:17 [PATCH] documentation: add missing word "ref" Monika Kairaitytė via GitGitGadget
2024-10-01 18:36 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-10-09 19:38 ` Monika Kairaityte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy137wtyz.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=monika@kibit.lt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).