From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763AB74BE1 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 22:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723500132; cv=none; b=sUhxhLCRAnzR82vUsbshDDi6mi3W7dqWJV7SYoHaxVjwUkj7mr0x3rxLqugRoq95Xi/uXWrI6vNVCeFzZL8RWSbpijL/wqmm23+ZSFZPERa5QO+o13JqsxHDwXa/BEmGI+daHcMSuKcVFKGcy1kkKUGxLj+B3dbwNP1k42yu98U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723500132; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LlDns7mwqzrACuWzkWuvc7us9FwOUCg8EzbNJarWBT0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eBgyTinfqXAXg7MHUIcU9zU+zb/OQq5W8LI5XJIK+3/phWQB2e9fn7X5VvRMKw/IMK8BIBPKJFWxGFxvflUQqbhHBTaGEBXsxMa9yyGPjI5Tx1ziVbLf5lVZiPRRM2Fl98/hd04QIAB1mlnOr+NlSvlPHr2mpwMwk//06rv4tYM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=XvckJVD9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XvckJVD9" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BDF3F23C; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:02:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=LlDns7mwqzrACuWzkWuvc7us9FwOUCg8EzbNJa rWBT0=; b=XvckJVD9pzq6mfl7RUrSd4zRFoqyoepTpRwGL6gXOsTGjt6yuQ5jWm Ey+NR3JaVYqvT3KYF6EfRr3KTLJh2CCfqp1rA67u6cJQnrSBhM4o/88LUjH0siqn q/tFZ4WUBrXPJXlG+Rgz7oYRLc0pgFOEtXjU/QaJfIz24FgsNeqis= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF42A3F23B; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:02:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.108.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52D3B3F23A; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:02:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: Eric Sunshine , Dragan Simic , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , git@vger.kernel.org, calvinwan@google.com, spectral@google.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, emrass@google.com, rsbecker@nexbridge.com, mh@glandium.org, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce cgit-rs, a Rust wrapper around libgit.a In-Reply-To: (Josh Steadmon's message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:24:03 -0700") References: <6398d60387a6607398e4b8731363572e@manjaro.org> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:02:05 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 841ED682-58F6-11EF-893A-E92ED1CD468F-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Josh Steadmon writes: >> But just a dismissing "Bikeshed on the name", as if they do not care >> to be mistaken as saying "those who complain about the name are only >> bikeshedding and not worth listening to"? >> >> We should do better than that. > > I am quite surprised that people felt this was dismissive. So to be > clear: yes, we need a new name before this lands in next. I thought that > leaving that as a known needs-work item was sufficient to call that out, > but I guess I was wrong. Yes, I had a similar initial reaction, but I guess that comes primarily from the fact that we both misjudged how "cgit" is already deeply established name that refers to something other than this project.