From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98E2156C66 for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 18:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715021528; cv=none; b=M+cFvNnH01RI9YMgp4rlurTzLg3cUhJKjox4B/6GXXAfxHeR4fG6zQB8O3PB0Qre2QGHtI0uWoyKDYpEy4Iw01mzkt3uNO/bwQ+i8m2jEq+0yvU/4fzvaR9+E6uEynEmTTbn41tmcY3KLgiBXXLoy6pGkHjvcipuexbpgnu5J+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715021528; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wdiQF165h8mWOOdpBYOoUTf9JzHi947yw5RLkYOCRdQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=X1bAmlRchrheMEimUxO3zw1R3fU8NPayaqbMiuAU7+sshfZ+BiU+BCAXUrg4bml2RAiUSnf1uZErdPcFecjnuGfAPsKRDOXMDrGd77ZZEdkAjaMEbELPol5j2rArhTVRiHxsyI33L4s5zIN+vvWlu0GaftYTGKYHdyX0+nJ2Y94= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=G9bKIuHp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="G9bKIuHp" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BF1229D8; Mon, 6 May 2024 14:52:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=wdiQF165h8mWOOdpBYOoUTf9JzHi947yw5RLkY OCRdQ=; b=G9bKIuHp0dHTUDagz4pYf3ZdCBZsBUXDUX2eIcCHm7BC65M0SGIsxi QwnW6hn7yOhFpQkrzgb921SVfbZKnO1WB4SiJvDJPz7Z4Kzv30T0WBLEIVC/NE+A MpcjvOlpag31Wh4wuKjZjS0R00hhPbcSJbQGIrCjJ893SlxtW50Is= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1DE229D7; Mon, 6 May 2024 14:52:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.120.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F12A229D6; Mon, 6 May 2024 14:52:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab-ci: add smoke test for fuzzers In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 6 May 2024 12:08:26 +0200") References: <01fb94999f8e2014ba4d09ce7451a4f5d315ee72.1714371146.git.ps@pks.im> Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 11:52:02 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BB1935E8-0BD9-11EF-9682-78DCEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:13:23AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> Our GitLab CI setup has a test gap where the fuzzers aren't exercised at >> all. Add a smoke test, similar to the one we have in GitHub Workflows. >> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt > > Junio, I haven't seen this topic getting picked up in your "What's > cooking" report yet. Is this intentional or did it simply fall through > the cracks? The latter. Thanks for a ping that is designed to make it easy to find the patch (by going to the message it is a response to).