From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] reftable: fix writing multi-level indices
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 08:26:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy1ccnjs3.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1706263918.git.ps@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:31:30 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> yesterday I noticed that writing reftables with more than 250,000 refs
> led to the last block of refs in the table not being seekable anymore.
> As it turns out, 250k refs was the boundary at which we start to write
> multi-level indices for refs.
Obviously one of the less exercised corners of the code ;-)
> The topic depends on Junio's jc/reftable-core-fsync at 1df18a1c9a
> (reftable: honor core.fsync, 2024-01-23) due to a semantic merge
> conflict in the newly added test.
Thanks for the note for the base. John Cai's work is well done and
has been reviewed, so let's merge it down to 'next' soonish.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 10:31 [PATCH 0/5] reftable: fix writing multi-level indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] reftable/reader: be more careful about errors in indexed seeks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] reftable/writer: use correct type to iterate through index entries Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] reftable/writer: simplify writing index records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 13:44 ` Toon Claes
2024-02-01 8:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 15:55 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-02-01 8:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] reftable/writer: fix writing multi-level indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] reftable: document reading and writing indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-26 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-02-01 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] reftable: fix writing multi-level indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable/reader: be more careful about errors in indexed seeks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/writer: use correct type to iterate through index entries Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] reftable/writer: simplify writing index records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] reftable/writer: fix writing multi-level indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-05 23:56 ` jltobler
2024-02-06 7:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] reftable: document reading and writing indices Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 1:43 ` jltobler
2024-02-06 7:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy1ccnjs3.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).