From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:41:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy1o5op1i.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAl4pZV08a6Bgoip@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2023 01:11:49 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> - if a project really does have a workflow that likes prefix-less
> patches, and the receiver is prepared to use "-p0", then the sender
> now has to manually say "--no-prefix" for each format-patch
> invocation. That doesn't seem _too_ terrible given that the receiver
> has to manually say "-p0" for each git-am invocation.
It does seem very terrible if any existing projects do use the
workflow, as their receivers need to change their workflow, though.
But we can declare that we do not care about such projects that do
not honor our -p1 worldview, and I have no objection to this change
if we can have list consensus for us to go in that direction.
Colored patches, by the way, cannot be applied, so perhaps we should
disable ui_config altogether, on the other hand? I dunno.
Thanks, queued.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 20:15 Better suggestions when git-am(1) fails Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 3:17 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:06 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] diff: factor out src/dst prefix setup Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:50 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] t4013: add tests for diff prefix options Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] diff: add --default-prefix option Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:51 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 16:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:44 ` Jeff King
2023-03-10 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 16:43 ` Jeff King
2023-03-13 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 19:54 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:53 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-10 9:49 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] format-patch: add format.noprefix option Jeff King
2023-03-09 17:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:51 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:58 ` Better suggestions when git-am(1) fails Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:54 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:39 ` Jeff King
2023-03-10 16:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 16:37 ` Jeff King
2023-03-13 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy1o5op1i.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).