From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] archive: deduplicate verbose printing
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy1tjfu9b.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cRuqq=n=CLkCSH=axLO92=F2JGwNnK51aBEeCoMSdJjqg@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:02:36 -0400")
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:40 AM René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> wrote:
>> +test_expect_success 'git archive --verbose' '
>> + git archive --verbose HEAD >verbose.tar 2>err &&
>> + test_cmp_bin b.tar verbose.tar &&
>> + find a -type d | sed s-\$-/- >verbose.lst &&
>> + find a \! -type d >>verbose.lst &&
>
> Aside: I was curious whether or not we care about older `find`
> implementations which don't print anything at all if `-print` isn't
> specified, but I see that the test suite already has a mixture of
> `find` invocations -- some with and some without `-print` -- so that
> answers my question.
It indicates that everybody is POSIX enough these days ;-)
I do think it is better to be more explicit to write "-print" when
we mean it, and I wouldn't mind a clean-up patch every once in a
while when the area of the tree being affected are quiescent.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-11 9:29 [PATCH] archive: deduplicate verbose printing René Scharfe
2022-10-11 12:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-13 10:35 ` René Scharfe
2022-10-13 17:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-10-13 18:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy1tjfu9b.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).