From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
GIT Mailing-list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: improve SPARSE_FLAGS customisation
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 12:15:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy36vtimu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <365a9539-4ce1-121a-ec8c-2e52a5828091@ramsayjones.plus.com> (Ramsay Jones's message of "Mon, 4 Feb 2019 19:20:12 +0000")
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> On 04/02/2019 18:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
>>
>>>> Thanks for a detailed and clear explanation here and in the cover
>>>> letter. I agree with the motivation and most of the things I see in
>>>> this patch, but one thing that stands out at me is if we still want
>>>> to += append to SP_EXTRA_FLAGS in target specific way. Before this
>>>> patch, because SPARSE_FLAGS was a dual use variable, it needed +=
>>>> appending to it in these two places, but that rationale is gone with
>>>> this patch.
>>>
>>> As Luc surmised, in his reply, my intention was that SP_EXTRA_FLAGS
>>> should be used for any 'internal' settings (not just the target
>>> specific settings), whereas SPARSE_FLAGS would now be used _only_ for
>>> user customisation.
>>
>> OK, if that is the case, then not using "+= append" on SP_EXTRA_FLAGS
>
> Err, no, that clearly wouldn't be an improvement! As I said above,
> this is not just for target specific settings.
Ah, do you mean that there may be globally applicable internal
setting? I would have expected that such an option would be done
directly on the command line, e.g.
$(SP_OBJ): %.sp: %.c GIT-CFLAGS FORCE
$(QUIET_SP)cgcc -no-compile $(ALL_CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CPPFLAGS) \
$(SPARSE_FLAGS) $(SP_EXTRA_FLAGS) \
-Wsparse-settings-for-everybody $<
But it is fine either way, as long as the purpose of the macro is
documented clearly enough ;-)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-04 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-01 21:03 [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: improve SPARSE_FLAGS customisation Ramsay Jones
2019-02-01 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-01 22:48 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2019-02-03 1:25 ` Ramsay Jones
2019-02-04 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-04 19:20 ` Ramsay Jones
2019-02-04 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-02-04 20:49 ` Ramsay Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy36vtimu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).