Re: [PATCH v3] doc: checkout: rewrite detached HEAD state explanation

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca> writes:

> This is a case where if we really want to make sure it's clear, we need
> to go get feedback from users. There's likely a better way to explain it
> but I don't think that this conversation will result in an improvement.
> Really doing a good job of explaining HEAD is a pretty big project.
>
> It's not clear to me if you think the current wording is unusable
> or if you just think it could be better.

Then let me make it clear.

I do not know if your version is unusable or good enough, but if you
are going to take one version to guinea-pig readers to test and
polish starting from that version, I think what I gave you would
give us a better starting point.

Otherwise I would not be suggesting replacements (this applies to
all other points in the message you are responding to).

Thanks.