Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>,
	 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] connected: add incremental connectivity check
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 11:55:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzewi695w.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2211.v3.git.1791806877.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:07:53 +0000")

"Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> I'll just mention a short summary here, to avoid repeating what's already in
> the commit message. The incremental mode is faster than the full mode when
> there are few commits to verify and when the active object tree is large. In
> the happy case, the work tracks the changed paths and their comparison trees
> rather than the full reachable object closure, which substantially reduces
> the dependence on total repository size.

This is exciting.

> There are also regression cases in the synthetic fixtures. With long
> incoming histories, the extra parent-tree scans accumulate; in the synthetic
> fixture incremental is about 1.5x slower at 10000 commits. Per-commit
> ...
> A safety net for this regression could be to dynamically disable the
> incremental mode if the number of incoming commits is too large, but this is
> left out of the initial version to avoid overly speculative code.

Hmm, ... OK.

> Deepening fetches currently fall back to the full check because the full
> check omits --not --all for deepening -- there is no existing-reference
> boundary at which the walk can stop. An incremental approach is possible
> here too -- using the old shallow roots as the trusted boundary and walking
> the deepened ancestry forward -- but that is a separate change and left for
> future work. Deepening is also less common than regular fetch and
> receive-pack, where the speedup matters most.

OK.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  9:47 [PATCH 0/2] connected: add incremental connectivity check Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-09-14  9:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: describe connectivity checking Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-09-14  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] connected: add incremental connectivity check via rev-list Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-09-14 15:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-14 17:46     ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-09-14 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] connected: add incremental connectivity check Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 " Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 13:02   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: describe connectivity checking Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-05  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-05 19:17       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-06  5:59         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-06 10:03           ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-06 10:12       ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-09-28 13:02   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] connected: add incremental connectivity check via rev-list Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-05  8:00     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-06 10:37       ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-06 12:08         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-06 12:36           ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-12 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] connected: add incremental connectivity check Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 12:07   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: describe connectivity checking Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 12:07   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] p5413: add perf tests for connectivity check Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 12:07   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] connected: add transfer.connectivityCheck config and rev-list flag Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 18:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-13  7:41       ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-13 13:46         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-12 12:07   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] connected: add incremental connectivity check via rev-list Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-13  7:54     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] connected: add incremental connectivity check Kristofer Karlsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqzewi695w.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=krka@spotify.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox